User talk:Colex335

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Colex335, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 10:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to European Union, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Scottish National Party. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Haynes moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wendy Haynes, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:41, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm FDW777. Your recent edit(s) to the page House of Commons of the United Kingdom appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Hello, I'm FDW777. I noticed that you recently made an edit to House of Commons of the United Kingdom in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FDW777 (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The official list of MPs proves your edit is incorrect. FDW777 (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Labour Party (UK). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Leader of the Democratic Unionist Party moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Commons Leader of the Democratic Unionist Party, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 15:47, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Government of Scotland Bill 1913 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Government of Scotland Bill 1913, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CatcherStorm ^talk 13:24, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be Willing to Help me Male the Page as I am uninformed on how to make a Wikipedia Page Colex335 (talk) 13:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Arms & Hearts. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Black bloc in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.

Draft:Wendy Haynes concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wendy Haynes, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wendy Haynes

Hello, Colex335. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wendy Haynes".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:46, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Commons Leader of the Democratic Unionist Party

Hello, Colex335. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Commons Leader of the Democratic Unionist Party".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:48, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please refrain from vandalism. NEDOCHAN (talk) 11:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What did I vandalise?

Colex335 (talk) 19:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have much patience with nonsense associated with QAnon. It's baloney, and we say so. Acroterion (talk) 20:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You changed an entire fight record on Nick Diaz, when it was sourced and correct. NEDOCHAN (talk) 17:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at House of Commons of the United Kingdom. FDW777 (talk) 22:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the picture of the House of Commons it has 5 independent MPs, what did I do wrong? Colex335 (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An alleged picture does not change the fact that the House of Commons does not agree. FDW777 (talk) 07:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Government of Scotland Bill 1913

Hello, Colex335. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Government of Scotland Bill 1913".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of UFC Champions

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of UFC Champions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop changing Sterling's nationality. He's American, not Jamaican. Thank you. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scottish Family Party

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Scottish Family Party, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. doktorb _words^deeds 23:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Scottish Family Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scottish Family Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottish Family Party. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chirota (talk) 01:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert without seeing Discussion and giving a reason

Dear Colex335,

Please leave a edit summary, or explain why you're reverting in the Discussion page (c:File talk:Scottish-parliament.svg). Did you look at any of the three talk pages? Egroeg5 (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Reform UK, you may be blocked from editing. You should know better by now. Doug Weller talk 13:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]