User talk:Cognitivism

Welcome!

Hi Cognitivism! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 11:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faits et Documents has been accepted

Faits et Documents, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:08, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've reviewed Faits et Documents and found it to be problematic. I've noted within the article places where there are facts stated without sources ("Citation needed"), and where the provided citations do not support the facts stated. For each "failed verification", if you hover over the link, it will show the reason I provided; in most cases you've cited statements or quotes, but the cited article did not verify the given statement or quote. I hope you can address these issues. If not, I might recommend that the article be moved back to the Draft space until it is more ready for publication. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Juliette Armanet

added links pointing to Barbara, Biot, Asnières and Canal+

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alain Kruger moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alain Kruger. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Looks notable, but too many unsourced paragraphs which are liable for deletion without a source. Please add sources to each section then move back to main.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your article on Yael Mellul

Hi there, Cognitivism, and thank you for creating Yael Mellul. It looks to me as if you based the article on a translation of the French version. In order to avoid copyright problems you need to explain this in an edit summary in accordance with Help:Translation. It is preferable to add an explanation in the first edit comment when creating articles based on translations but in the case of Mellul you can simply add "this article is based on the French version" when you next edit the article. If you intend to create more biographies of women, you might like to join WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve women's coverage on Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've just been looking at your other creations and see that you need to deal with translation in quite a few more. I've included a translation tag on the talk pages but you need to comment in edit summaries on the articles themselves.--Ipigott (talk) 10:37, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Laurent de Sutter moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Laurent de Sutter. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Fram (talk) 15:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, i just did it right now for all the 30 pages i've created.Cognitivism (talk) 16:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Fram (talk) 16:29, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth

Please read WP:DOB. A date of birth for a living person must cite a reliable source. Schazjmd (talk) 16:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thank you. Cognitivism (talk) 17:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Authority

Hello. The |qid= parameter is for specifying the Wikidata qid of that person. You were using Q2406524 for everyone, but this is Arnaud Viviant (Q2406524) — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much !! Cognitivism (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]