User talk:Cocorrector

Welcome

Hello, Cocorrector, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - wolf 18:14, 10 November 2018 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Nomination of MacCullagh ellipsoid for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MacCullagh ellipsoid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacCullagh ellipsoid until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. D.Lazard (talk) 12:32, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sandro78, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MrOllie (talk) 12:16, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Galois axis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galois axis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galois axis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — MarkH21 (talk) 15:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Lame arguments at ANI

I'm posting this here since I'm somewhat confused whether your socking or just a meatpuppet and who the master is anyway. In the event you are ever unblocked, do note that "they were deleting not editing" is an even lamer argument at ANI then "they didn't discuss, even though nor did I". Perhaps this is in part because your English level is less than native but on wikipedia, deletion is by definition part of the editing process. Mind you, calling something WP:vandalism when it clearly is not vandalism is IMO an even lamer argument. If you want anyone to take you seriously, do use the talk page to discuss WP:content disputes whether those content disputes involve deletion or whatever else. Don't call stuff vandalism when it's good faith editing. If you demonstrate silly behaviour by refusing to discuss e.g. by insisting someone else opens the discussion first or the article is reverted to your preferred WP:WRONGVERSION before discussion and/or persistently calling stuff vandalism which isn't, expect to get no where even if you aren't socking. Nil Einne (talk) 09:29, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

"Galois axis" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Galois axis. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 12#Galois axis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Salix alba (talk): 19:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)