User talk:Christopher Geertsen

Metro Township (United States) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Metro Township (United States), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:56, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metro Township (United States)

The article Metro Township (United States) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This isn't really fit any speedy deletion category. I think this is about some kind of town government structure? It's confusing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Almy (talk) 00:51, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Metro Township (United States)

The article Metro Township (United States) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has been PRODed once, moved to draft, recreated by the original editor, PRODed again, and the pager creator removed that PROD. However, the pags is still incoherent and the added reference link doesn't work. This page should be either deleted or moved to Draft and left there until it's made suitable. As a side note, per my original PROD some overview of the politician in question doesn't reflect what this article appears to say. It needs referencing and a complete re-write.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 18:13, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Miley Cyrus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 08:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at World War II, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon 08:54, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kearns, Utah. Begoon 00:06, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:44, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Christopher Geertsen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to Wikipedia and it's been 3 years since I was blocked. I am doing alot better since and would like to be of good service from here on out. I hope that I can be unblocked and be given a second chance. Thanks for your consideration. Christopher Geertsen (talk) 09:44, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I am giving you a last chance. PhilKnight (talk) 08:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What edits do you want to make, if unblocked? PhilKnight (talk) 10:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would want to make truthful and correct edits on pages that need updating from time to time. I would like to focus on the Kearns Township Wikipedia page that's for the hometown I grew up in that is near and dear to my heart. When testing things out, I would use sandbox mode so nothing will get messed up. I hope to do a good turn. I hope to influence Wikipedia in a positive way moving forward. Christopher Geertsen (talk) 06:14, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]