User talk:Christiancool123

November 2020

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Staples Center—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 03:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I just wanted to edit something and I liked that edit because it’s a very good edit and I feel like you shouldn’t revert it mean. Christiancool123 (talk) 03:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Christiancool123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Christiancool123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of first ladies of the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Flix11 (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Chris Paul appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 01:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Jrue Holiday. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. The source you cited in the edit summary said "Milwaukee reportedly will trade Eric Bledsoe, George Hill and future Draft picks for the two-time All-Defensive standout." That is not the same as the past-tense "traded" that you wrote. —Bagumba (talk) 17:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hi Bagumba heres proof that it is official. https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/trade-grades-bucks-acquire-jrue-holiday-from-pelicans-for-eric-bledsoe-george-hill-three-first-round-picks/

December 2020

Hello, I'm Sportzpikachu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jake Paul—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ―sportzpikachu _{my talkcontribs} 23:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to LaMelo Ball, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:18, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

James Wiseman

Hello Christiancool123, sorry. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:James Wiseman college.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:James Wiseman college.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:21, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Daequan (streamer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Daequan (streamer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThadeusOfNazereth^{Talk to Me!} 23:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21 Savage immigration feud moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 21 Savage immigration feud, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dream SMP (server)

A tag has been placed on Dream SMP (server) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7: no indication of importance (group). Would best fit in the article about Dream (YouTuber)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SWinxy (talk) 23:07, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GeorgeNotFound (YouTuber)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GeorgeNotFound (YouTuber) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 15:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GeorgeNotFound (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on GeorgeNotFound (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:49, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, GeorgeNotFound (disambiguation), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use your sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Taulia Tagovailoa (quarterback) into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were not the only user to edit that draft, so yes, attribution is required according to Wikipedia's copyrights. Additionally, page moves should occur using the move function, not by copying and pasting, in order to preserve edit histories in one place. You also circumvented the Articles for Creation procedure by recreating the page in mainspace, against consensus from the previous Articles for deletion discussion. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taulia Tagovailoa (quarterback)

The article Taulia Tagovailoa (quarterback) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy general notability or gridiron football notability . Has not played American football at the professional level, and does not have general notability as a college athlete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:15, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User page edit

What's your association with Sorcererzthunder, and why did you create their userpage? Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:36, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

idk and my acc must’ve got hacked cause I did not Christiancool123 (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is suspected that it has been compromised. If your account is locked, please contact ca

wikimedia.org. Otherwise, if you are able to confirm that you are the user who created this account, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section), then add this below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}.Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s sad that you can ban someone because that person is bored

I don’t know how or when I created that page. But I do know if I did it would be because I was bored and I’m a Wikipedia lover. So this is bull crap. I mean like the heck? All I put was “idk” on the page. I mean, bruh. Cmon u gotta be better than that. How come you gonna be a admin and using your powers to ban random people. That’s sad man you gotta be better.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christiancool123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was bored and all I created was “idk” I don’t see the reason why I should get banned permanently Christiancool123 (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are not banned permanently, you are blocked indefinitely. You need to account for your vandalism stretching back months, and explain how we can trust you to only edit constructively from now on. Yamla (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christiancool123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

blocked and banned, same thing, because the only dang thing I can do IS READ. I have not had no violations in the past, I only joined 4 months ago! You guys just abusing your admin powers because I out “idk” creating somebody’s page. Like bruh I don’t know this person or he know me. This is bullcrap. Christiancool123 (talk) 17:45, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked because you said your account was hacked. Am I missing something? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 20:22, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As the block template says, I blocked your account because you indicated this account may have been compromised. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:43, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christiancool123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No your not missing anything, I Indicated that my account was hacked because I don’t recall me logging in on February 1st according to revisions when I made that edit. I did not know the rules that if you get hacked your account gets blocked. If I did get hacked, (which I’m not 100% sure but I’m about I will change my password. If I made that edit (which again, I don’t recall) then either I was bored or I was being a dumb adult. I hope you understand (which you probably wont), I’m a new Wikipedia editor (4 months), wanting to become a administrator, so please understand. Christiancool123 (talk) 20:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We generally take people at their word when they tell us their account got hacked, and per networking security best practices it's usually best that, without 2FA or a committed identity, we just leave the account blocked. Especially in a situation where the account owner isn't quite sure this happened (just better to assume that it did). Now, if you want to edit again, you should argue as to why you'll be a better editor this time around so we can let you create a new account. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:42, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christiancool123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I'm Christian. I've been editing for 4 months on this account and for the last 5 years on an IP address. It heartbroke me when I was banned. For the last 4 months, I've been doing sports edits, gaming edits, and reverting any possible vandalism. I've been trying my BEST, my really Best, to become a administrator, and extended confirmed, I'm sorry if I confused the admin system, with me saying I was hacked. I don't know who or what or why I made that edit. I was very confused. As I understand you might've been too, I try to create positive air. But I've realized that you can't do that for everything. There are gonna be some road bumps throughout your journey, and I'm sorry for any violations that I've committed in the past. I'm sorry for arguing with the administration, it's been very confusing over the last day. Everybody I know tells me Wikipedia is a unreliable source. But I've believed that Wikipedia ha brought me some if the happiest times, and brought me some info that I could rely on forever. So I ask please and please. May I please get unblocked? Christiancool123 (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Keep in mind that you don't need to be an administrator to be a good contributor; you can do 95% of things here without being an administrator. Being an administrator gives one no special status or authority; it's just some extra buttons. If I were you I would set aside for the moment the goal of becoming an administrator and just focus on being a good contributor. Wikipedia is indeed not a reliable source; we summarize what reliable sources say- readers should examine those sources when looking at Wikipedia, and not just trust what articles say on blind faith. This request is a good beginning, but it will help if you provide examples of constructive edits you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

page:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Christiancool123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So it seems, that I’ve did everything I could to get me unblocked, but I haven’t. My edits that I make are constructive, sporty, gamer way, and reverting vandalism such as this one: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Jaret_Patterson&oldid=991228925 ,I hope you guys understand me. I just want to be a Wikipedia editor thanked and everything. I revert vandalism, try to at least fix pages 30 percent. So please. I hope you understand. This has been hard going through being blocked. Christiancool123 (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No response to question in 6 days. PhilKnight (talk) 08:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What subjects do you want to edit? PhilKnight (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this user is now editing from their disclosed alternate account Animeboychris123. I blocked Christiancool123's account as they said they were possibly hacked, so the alternate account should not be blocked for block evasion. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eagles247 im not lol im now a editor on fandom so get it right — Preceding unsigned comment added by Animeboychris123 (talk • contribs) 23:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I tried giving you the benefit of the doubt. In the comment above, you tried to claim Animeboychris123 is not your alternate account... but posted it while logged in with your alternate account. Alternate account now blocked for sockpuppetry. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagles247: The accounts are controlled by the same editor, in case they try to claim otherwise or it becomes pertinent to an appeal.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Templates don't unblock you

Changing the block template doesn't make you unblocked. ―sportzpikachu _{my talkcontribs} 03:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what is going on??

what is all of this madness? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marwato (talk • contribs) 02:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Late reply. Maybe someone is abusing their talkpage on Wikipedia. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 12:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Killua Zoldyck

Hello, Christiancool123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Killua Zoldyck, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Killua Zoldyck

Hello, Christiancool123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Killua Zoldyck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:21 Savage immigration feud

Hello, Christiancool123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:21 Savage immigration feud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:21 Savage immigration feud

Hello, Christiancool123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "21 Savage immigration feud".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]