User talk:Cholo Aleman
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Cholo Aleman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 08:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
- Hi Cholo Aleman! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 12:58, Thursday, June 7, 2018 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Scientists
[edit]I'm delighted to see your work in adding articles on notable scientists--I gather you intend to comprehensively add those from your list of those at the MPI--and Isee your similar work at the deWP. As you do, possibly I can give you some hints from my experience working mainly on this subject field at enWP for the last 12 years. Though I do not write articles at the deWP, I have translated and revised translations of articles from there , and there are some noteworthy differences.
The enWP does not encourage articles in list or outline format, or divided into multiple small sections. Biographies of academic are usually divided into Biography and education, Academic Career, Honours, and Publications, with sometimes a section of Public career, if appropriate. In the publications section for those whose notability is derived from published books, we list all the books, and give references though not quotations from 3rd party reviews--usually keeping successive editions and translations together. If there are multiple major books, we do not usually list journal articles also, unelss there are a frew of special importance. For people in fields where notability is from peer-reviewed articles, we normally list the most cited, using data from Google Scholar or Scopus or WoS. If we need to make refernece to a complete list, we add it as an external link--ideally, we should have an external link to the full academic CV, as well as to whatever is the personal web page.
Sourcing in the enWP is typically more detailed than in the deWP--in particular, for biographies of living people, every paragraph at least must have a reliable source, specified inline according to WP:REFBEGIN--we do not rely on the sort of general references customary in the deWP (I'm not saying our way is better, but such specific references are our requirement). Normally, I would move a bio like that of Jacqueline Knörr to draft spacem because it does not have them, but considering your experience, I'm going to wait a few days for you to fix them. (Yes, I could fix them myself, but it's your responsibility--I try to check asmany articles as possible, so I can't fix them all myself). And, incidentally, I'm a little surprised you didn;t add it to the deWP as well.
If I can help you with anything, please let me know on my user talk page. DGG ( talk ) 01:43, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Cholo Aleman,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kingsif and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jacqueline Knörr, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Kingsif (talk) 13:26, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Jacqueline Knörr moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Jacqueline Knörr, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Jacqueline Knörr moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Jacqueline Knörr, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:43, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Test
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Mario Markus moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Mario Markus, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Mario Markus
[edit]
Hello, Cholo Aleman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mario Markus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mario Markus
[edit]
Hello, Cholo Aleman. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mario Markus".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Cholo Aleman. Thank you for your work on Max Planck Law. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
The subject is important, but the page has required quite a bit of work to get up to standard. It's never a good idea to start a page with the justification of ignore all rules, and in this case is wasn't necessary. Remember to consolidate references for concision, keep external links out of the body of the text and write from a neutral point of view.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)