User talk:Chilli plant

Chilli plant, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Chilli plant! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vinca ispartensis has been accepted

Vinca ispartensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Great work on Vinca ispartensis thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 22:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Theroadislong: Thank you for the strawberries! Chilli plant (talk) 14:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Companies House: registered offices etc

You are doing good work on Companies House. I just realised the sections on 'Registered offices' and 'Register of company directors' were not old but were newly added, so it was rude of me to abruptly remove them. My reasoning was that the text, although a good summary of company law, wasn't specific to CH. For example, if CH ceased to exist for some reason, companies would still be required to have registered offices. --Wire723 (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Wire723: Thank you! :-)

No worries: I actually only added 'Registered offices'; 'Register of company directors' was already on the page, but I did change the subheading level.

I added 'Registered offices' because it appears on a list on the Companies House website of everything included on the publicly accessible register (you can view it here if you wish).

As far as I understand, an undertaking's registered office is a distinct concept from its place of business; while I agree undertakings would still have a place of business (such as a shop) if Companies House ceased to exist, there could not be a registered office without Companies House as there would no longer be a register for its address to appear on (if that makes sense). There also seems to be a whole industry whereby an agent can be appointed to provide a registered office (see here on the Companies House website) in order to keep an undertaking's place of business private, which further suggests to me that undertakings have a registered office in order to satisfy regulatory requirements, rather than because their underlying businesses could not exist without one.

In light of this, I think there should be a mention of registered offices somewhere on the Companies House page, but the text I wrote can definitely be expanded upon to make the intrinsic link between the existence of a registered office and the existence of the register at Companies House much clearer.

What do you think? :-)

--Chilli plant (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Indeed that list of public details in your first CH website link could be the basis of a "Services provided" section (which could also say, like the site, that viewing & searching are free of charge).

Currently the registered office is mentioned under "By jurisdiction" although to my mind the details about displaying the address on letters etc belongs in Registered office --Wire723 (talk) 14:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Wire723: I think those are good ideas and would improve both articles :-) --Chilli plant (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquilegia viridiflora has been accepted

Aquilegia viridiflora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bennv3771 (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oxalis inaequalis has been accepted

Oxalis inaequalis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)