User talk:Channel 1915

Welcome!

Hello, Channel 1915, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Channel 1915, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:04, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Richard Heydarian

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Richard Heydarian, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Heydarian

Hello, Channel 1915. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Richard Heydarian, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jay8g [V•T•E] 00:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sam Verzosa. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.

Please do review WP:SYNTH. It seems you are on a crusade to expose the subject for his controversy. But we have to follow policies and Wikipedia is not a place for WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. If no published reliable sources mentioned controversies we cannot imply a controversy exist when reliable source do not mention it at all.

Like we cannot use a perfectly neutral article 'Comelec releases list of party-list groups’ nominees for 2025 polls' from the Philippine Daily Inquirer only discussing in plain cold fact that they have published the partylist nominees list to assert that there is controversy that Versoza is using Tutok to Win Partylist that he is building a political dynasty. It is true that he is technically building a political dynasty but there is no assertion mention by the article that there is such controversy (or any of the other persons on the list at all). That is WP:SYNTH in a nutshell. So please be prudent on what additions you are adding. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:10, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sam Verzosa, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted.

Also I do not have access to the DOJ resolution please provide a quotation. Example: {{cite web|quote="Insert quote here}} Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:32, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, will comply accordingly. Thank you Channel 1915 (talk) 13:44, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship

Please stop accusing users of WP:BADFAITH. I can even point you out where to raise such issues. This is not censorship. I'm merely in the progress of paraphrasing of what you added. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Channel 1915 You aren't going to reply. Communication in edit summary is not idealHariboneagle927 (talk) 07:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Channel 1915 Go ahead, report me to the admin. You refuse to even communicate with me. Frankly the way you word the text is too much of "a word salad". You continue to assume WP:BADFAITH censorship and call my summarizing as lousy writing without pointing out.Hariboneagle927 (talk) Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. There seems to have been a misunderstanding. I do believe some of the rephrasing and editing could do better, and that it would be fair to reflect some basic facts regarding some controversial issues in a balanced and commensurate manner. But I agree with your good intentions per the books and rules at Wiki. I will defer to your better judgments accordingly. Channel 1915 (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for finally responding, I am not the enemy here. But as I said before we can only work with the material we have. My intention is not to impose any censorship. But alas there is a lack of critical published information about the subject. If its SYSTEMICBIAS of the subject having considerable influence in the media (See WP:SBEXTERNAL) who knows. Like we do not read much about his Frontrow business on mainstream broadsheets despite the MLM being noted to be controversial in some social media circles. So I can see how my edits to make it compliant make it appear to be censorshipHariboneagle927 (talk) 13:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As per the Gusi Peace Award, I've asked the talk page of the relevant policy (WP Talk:No original research) for any input as well. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies again, just got to see your messages again. Shall definitely defer to your better judgment on the issues. Kindly just take the relevant information and context I shared into context.

Again, thank you for your kind patience, colleague! And thank you for your great service Channel 1915 (talk) 13:57, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind about the policy talk page. It was not the right place for article specific issues. But now we are at it. In my opinion, I don't think it is right to put too much weight on "ambassador" Gusi's credential controversy. as per WP:SYNTH. We are pushing a viewpoint not hinted at by the source that "Barry Gusi is not a fake diplomat" therefore "Verzosa's only award is a sham". If hypothetically a news site say Rappler made the connection then we can mention it.

I've already added the controversy to the main award article. If readers want to know more about this Gusi Peace Prize they can just click the article and read it including the controversy section which oddly doesn't mention the ambassador claim controversy before. No problem, and please don't be discouraged. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for your kind understanding and nuanced approach. Indeed, will see to it to more rigorously our rules and regulations :)

Also thank you for patiently engaging my responses. Channel 1915 (talk) 14:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On the cyber-libel issue, I felt it was very necessary to emphasize the precise context of the original column/s that was met by the cyber-libel charge. Otherwise, it would have come off as essentially promoting Verzosa's side of the story. The mention of "oh this lawyer is also facing another libel charge" actually implies guilt and serial offense. Hence, extremely important to provide full context and facts.

Again thank you for your understanding Channel 1915 (talk) 14:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, noticed there was an immediate move to another page, I had edited earlier right, immediately after our initial back-and-forth. That was a, to put it mildly, a bizarre form of "stalking"....?

Anyways, glad we have kept this professional. My initial concern was the rumor/concern that there are people "guarding" politicians' accounts, hence my initial misunderstanding of your intervention as "censorship"... Channel 1915 (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, as always, for great suggestions and edits! Goodnight, was a long long day :) Channel 1915 (talk) 16:56, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Sam Verzosa

Hello, This is to let you know that one of your recent edit at Sam Verzosa caused a citation error. you have added invalid url at {{Cite web}} template |url= blob: 2024-12-09_01311 (Lloyd Chu) Resolution 28 November 2024.pdf2.85 MB. Please add valid url and use preview before saving your edit. Happy editing.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 09:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file by the Department of Justice is only in PDF format. May I know how to upload it? Channel 1915 (talk) 12:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Channel 1915, see WP:CUM and Help:Files§Uploading files. anyway, can you provide the PDF files source url from where you have downloaded that file.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 13:11, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]