User talk:Ceravantes
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Shortie2349 (talk) 16:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hello! Ceravantes,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 19:46, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Robotmuse (talk) 13:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC)Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ceravantes for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Falcon8765 (TALK) 06:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]|
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ceravantes for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Falcon8765 (TALK) 06:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Florence "Diamond Flossie" Reilly for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Florence "Diamond Flossie" Reilly is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Florence "Diamond Flossie" Reilly until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Falcon8765 (TALK) 06:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Alice Walsh for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice Walsh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alice Walsh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Falcon8765 (TALK) 06:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
Indefinitely blocked
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ceravantes/Archive. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AGK [•] 22:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC) |