User talk:Shortie2349

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ceravantes for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 06:43, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shortie2349 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The incident in question happened nearly 4 years ago, and I actually think there was a bit of confusion as to the issue. For a class (admittedly on hoaxes), a few of us created wikipedia pages. The pages I created were all factual....just deemed insignificant for Wikipedia. I can assure you that there won't be any such issues in the future should I be unblocked. Thank you. Shortie2349 (talk) 01:09, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your block is actually for sock puppetry. In your next unblock request, I suggest you address this. PhilKnight (talk) 20:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.