Jump to content

User talk:Centralia1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Centralia1! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 05:43, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Self-published sources

[edit]

I just undid some additions you made to Cafeteria Catholics, because both the additions to the text and to the External Links were of a single source.... and that source appears to be self-published (on the site, it was listed as coming from the "open-publishing newswire", and as the website itself says "the open publishing newswire allows anyone to instantaneously self-publish their work"). Wikipedia's guidelines regarding self-published sources discourages their use. There are exceptions for work self-published by folks who are recognized experts in the relevant field, but the byline being merely "N. Evans" makes that hard to identify, and I could find no other reference to the newsletter this piece was stated to have run in.

Also, we tend not to put things in the External Links section that are also used as references in the article.

If you want to contend with these changes, please bring it up in discussion at Talk:Cafeteria Catholics. And have a fine weekend! --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:20, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nat Gertler,

You wrote:

"I just undid some additions you made to Cafeteria Catholics, because both the additions to the text and to the External Links were of a single source.... and that source appears to be self-published (on the site, it was listed as coming from the "open-publishing newswire", and as the website itself says "the open publishing newswire allows anyone to instantaneously self-publish their work"). Wikipedia's guidelines regarding self-published sources discourages their use. There are exceptions for work self-published by folks who are recognized experts in the relevant field, but the byline being merely "N. Evans" makes that hard to identify, and I could find no other reference to the newsletter this piece was stated to have run in.

Also, we tend not to put things in the External Links section that are also used as references in the article.

If you want to contend with these changes, please bring it up in discussion at Talk:Cafeteria Catholics. And have a fine weekend! --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:20, 7 August 2021 (UTC)"

Thank you for the clarification. I do find value in keeping the original external link as long as it is not referenced in the main article text. What do you think?

FYI I also added a citation needed tag for the intro of the main article text as no sources are mentioned.

Please do have a good weekend as well.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Centralia1 (talkcontribs)

Anarchism

[edit]

Hi Centralia1,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 03:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]