User talk:Catfishlake12

Final Warning

You are exactly one disruptive edit from being blocked. Knock it off. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Go to hell, DDLC is weaboo garbage

You're entitled to your opinion, just not to share it as if it was fact in an encyclopedia. You are also not entitled to tell anyone else here to "go to hell". See WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. General Ization ^Talk 15:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Catfishlake12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked just for stating the truth Catfishlake12 (talk) 18:38, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The admin that blocked you was being generous with a 72 hour block for your comments. The edits were indeed NOT in any way appropriate. The next block will likely be indefinite. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:General Ization, you do not have permission to remove the content from other people's talk pages, simply because you feel it is disruptive, or vandalism. Even if you believe this to be the case, the user him/herself has control over what is on their talk page, not you. Why haven't you been blocked for this? --Catfishlake12 (talk) 18:45, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI is that-a-way ... after you've finished being blocked. General Ization ^Talk 18:56, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Catfishlake12, Since I am the blocking admin I will let someone else address your unblock request. However it strikes me as frivolous, at best. That's not a good sign. Based on your recent pattern of editing you appear to be in the express lane heading for the exit marked "indefinite block." I strongly encourage you to change directions while you still can. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:05, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]