User talk:Caribmon

Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque/Chris Floyd

commented on Talk:Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque. Nateji77 12:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

you just need to post a line to that effect in either the edit summary or--if it's more than a line--on this talk page.

also be careful about Wikipedia:No original research re: TN/MS. if you get info directly from chris, it still needs to be verifiable elsewhere (being on his website is a verifiable source, so content from there should be okay). a wholesale paste-in of text isnt a good idea, for the simple reason that a writer's website, used to promote his work, and an encyclopedia entry on a writer, have different aims, different voices/styles, and should generally include different information. we should endeavour to describe writers, not to "sell" them in the sense a marketing/promotional website would.

i'd would also suggest not creating a new page at Chris Floyd for the time being. two reasons. 1, it might look as if you were trying to circument the deletion nomination. 2, if it's moved, rather than recreated, the edit history will remain intact, which is beneficial for future editors and for legal reasons concerning licensing content.

also (and i just learned this week) it's apparently bad form to delete content from your talk page w/o archiving it. i used to just delete mine whenever it got long, but apparently it can be interpreted as an attempt to hide criticism (which is not something i suspect you of, of course). Nateji77 21:50, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

sorry. "you just need to post a line to that effect in either the edit summary or--if it's more than a line--on this talk page." is in reference to the copyvio deletions. Nateji77 21:51, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

commented on Talk:Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque. 82.73.153.58 06:04, 26 September 2005 (UTC)caribmon[reply]

I have rewritten and condensed the new page from the bio at Chris Floyd's website to present the data more like what is available for other journalists such as Alexander Cockburn. As the original writer of the bio at the site - I am not violating any copyrights. Thanks for all the help Nateji77. As I learn more I hope to contribute more to Wikipedia - but I see there is a lot for me to pick up still.

if you look here you'll see that no other articles link to Chris Floyd. if the afd comes out "keep" i'd suggest creating some links in from relevant articles. Nateji77 10:14, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's interesting that it's now slated for deletion again. With no explanation. Nothing. What can I do? The page is not much different than many others such as Alexander Cockburn... and there are other writers/journalists that are not even in the same league as Chris. I don't really know what to do next. Caribmon 16:46, 4 October 2005 (UTC)caribmon[reply]

and unfortunately.... the first page has now been moved over the second, cleaned up page. do you have a backup of the new version you did, that used to be at Chris Floyd? i asked the admin i think did the move if we could get it back, but if you have it saved on yr computer thatd obviate the need to go thru whatever hassle retrieval might entail. Nateji77 16:28, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

signing your name

when you post on a talkpage, article, user, project, you can sign your name w/ three tildes ~~~ to give your name, or four ~~~~, for your name and a timestamp.

~~~ = Nateji77
~~~~ = Nateji77 21:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:AtDesk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AtDesk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:11, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Guys2.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Guys2.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:22, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Caribmon. You have new messages at Talk:Atlantic Free Press.
Message added 16:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DES ^(talk) 16:20, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Chris Floyd

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Chris Floyd. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Floyd. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Eusta.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eusta.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Chrisfloyd.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Chrisfloyd.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 11:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Chrisfloyd.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chrisfloyd.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 11:38, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque. Since you had some involvement with the Chris Floyd - Empire Burlesque redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Tagishsimon (talk) 20:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Floyd

A tag has been placed on Chris Floyd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As this article was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Floyd, you can't just put it back in again. I see that you have added a long string of references, but most of them are just links to articles Floyd has written. If you want the article back, you should first approach user Kurykh (talk · contribs), the administrator who closed the deletion discussion; if he does not agree, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. Kurykh will be able to see your new version to compare it with the previously deleted one, but if you want to go to Deletion Review ask below here and I will "userfy" it for you - restore it into a page in your user space - so that it will be visible for the DRV discussion. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Floyd

A tag has been placed on Chris Floyd requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Floyd

A tag has been placed on Chris Floyd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 06:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Caribmon. You have new messages at Ttonyb1's talk page.
Message added 06:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ttonyb (talk) 06:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:25, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Chris Floyd

I have nominated Chris Floyd, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Floyd (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. UtherSRG (talk) 08:20, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chris Floyd

A tag has been placed on Chris Floyd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 13:52, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Atlanticfreepress.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Atlanticfreepress.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:Atlanticfreepress.png

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: expathos (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Caribmon/sandbox/expathos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Caribmon/sandbox/expathos, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Caribmon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:John Clippinger, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. In addition, you added a new signature to an existing talk page message from another account. While there is reason to suspect that both accounts may have the same owner, even within that adding a new signature creates a misleading and confusing timestamp on the comment it was added to. I've restored my comment (and the attribution thereof) and have added a signature of record to the comment you added your signature to. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Caribmon. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page John Clippinger, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:48, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Caribmon/sandbox/expathos

Hello, Caribmon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Caribmon/sandbox/expathos.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:09, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Worldticketshop

The article Worldticketshop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG; non-notable ticket resale company.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B3251 (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]