User talk:CaptainDanger25

December 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Fuller House episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Fuller House episodes was changed by CaptainDanger25 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883041 on 2018-12-14T18:32:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spliting discussion for List of Fuller House episodes

An article that you have been involved with ( List of Fuller House episodes ) has content that is proposed to be removed and move to another article ('Fuller House (Season #) ). If you are interested, please visit the discussion at Talk:List of Fuller Episodes. Thank you. mrwoogi010 ^Talk 01:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Kid 2018 (talk • contribs) [reply]

WP:TWINKLE

Installing this script will let you load and file SPIs accurately and uniformly, as well as let you do quite a few other technical things much quicker. Like all automated tools, of course, the user remains responsible for their use, but as long as you don't dive head first into anything, you should be fine :) happy editing! ——SerialNumber54129 20:19, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

-- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:46, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can provide a brief summary of the problem, in case you decide to appeal this block to another checkuser: Checker Fred 2.0 (talk · contribs · block log). -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 14:54, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CaptainDanger25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Don't understand why I was blocked. I did agree to make edits on Checker Fred 2.0's drafts, and at the time didn't think it would be an issue. I know that I shouldn't of edited his draft articles he was working on. --CaptainDanger25 (talk) 16:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Same as here. —DoRD (talk) 22:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See User talk:Checker Fred 2.0. I can confirm that Checker Fred 2.0 is User:Simulation12, and responsible for much recent abuse (recent as in since I became involved - I know it goes much further back). At a minimum, you know this person, personally, and are working with them. They have used your computer. Charitable view aside, it appears you are the same user. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 17:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Zzuuzz: The person attacking me has no relation to me or Checker Fred. He or I have no idea who is attacking me. Checker Fred has never used my computer. --CaptainDanger25 (talk) 20:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Let me help you a little with some facts. Checker Fred 2.0 has used the same computer as both Simulation12 and various recent sockpuppets, you know the type, like this one. This isn't just wooly arm-waving SPI stuff; the checkuser evidence is very persuasive. You clearly know this person from somewhere; they are Simulation12. Additionally Checker Fred 2.0 registered their account on the same computer you were using, shortly after you filed an SPI case on 1 March. There's really only two credible theories: either you are Simulation12, or you have edited in the same room as Simulation12. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

CaptainDanger25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24423 was submitted on Mar 24, 2019 03:10:58. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:10, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]