User talk:Capouch
Welcome!
Hello, Capouch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! doncram (talk) 19:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Nice new article at Pulaski County Bridge No. 31. I asked at its talk page, Talk:Pulaski County Bridge No. 31, whether you might be able to add a photo. I see here that you do have experience taking and uploading photos, that's great. By the way, for an article about a NRHP-listed site, if you can take pics, it often is good to take several pics, including some focussed on interesting details of the site. Anyhow, nice job. I or others may add some other stuff to that article. doncram (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
December 2012
[edit]
Hello, I'm Zujua. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Geneva Mitchell, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zujua (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Capouch. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Capouch. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Capouch. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
"Dunn's Original KKK Pleasure Resort"
[edit]Hi,
I noticed that, slightly more than a year ago, you added information to articles about Dunns Bridge, Indiana and Tefft, Indiana that indicates that Dunns Bridge was originally called "Dunn’s Original KKK Pleasure Resort". However, I cannot locate a source for this information other than Wikipedia mirrors and one article published after your addition. Do you have a source that indicates it was once known by that name? If so, please cite it. If not, please do not add hoax information to articles. I have removed that information for now. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:20, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Response
[edit]I appreciate your efforts to keep the information on Wikipedia properly sourced, although you engage in the sort of heavy-handed behavior here (including implying that I'm engaging in a hoax) that serves as a disincentive for a person to contribute. Could you not have asked me to add the citation, instead of removing it first? I wouldn't have put it there if I hadn't known it to be true. The image here is a copy of the subdivision plat which is recorded at the Jasper County, Indiana Courthouse. Here is an image of the copy, which was printed in a "Plat Book" of the county. It is a copy only; the original citation would have to take the reader to the office of the Jasper County Indiana Recorder, which is now closed to the public because of COVID. Capouch (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for adding the citation! Normally I prefer to add {{Citation needed}} and leave the information in, assuming good faith on the part of the person who originally added it. However, in this instance, due to the nature of the claim and the potential harm that could result if it was intentional misinformation, I felt it was better to be safe than sorry and remove it in light of the fact that I couldn't locate anything to corroborate it that pre-dated its addition to the article. If I actually thought you intended it to be a hoax, I wouldn't have asked on your talk page for a citation, just removed it. On the other hand, if I didn't think there was a possibility it was a hoax from which harm could result, I wouldn't have removed it at all, but left it in tagged with a citation needed tag. At any rate, I'm glad it's back and cited now. Thank you. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 19:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Noggle Cemetery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication of notability. E.g., no notable burials, not recognized as an historical cemetery. Pictures do not relate to the actual cemetery.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – S. Rich (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2023 (UTC)