User talk:Canuckian89/Archive 7
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Canuckian89. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nomination of List of Chief Justices of Australia by age for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chief Justices of Australia by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Chief Justices of Canada by age for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Chief Justices of Canada by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of List of United States Chief Justices by age for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of United States Chief Justices by age until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Horse ages
I have reverted your edit at Flakey Dove. All racehorses bred in the northern hemisphere have their official birthdays on 1 January. Therefore all horses born in 1986 would have officially become 30 on 1 January 2016 (not that there are many of them left!). Tigerboy1966 09:11, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Userboxes Suggestion
Please note that your userbox User:Canuckian89/No Bruins is against the userbox guidelines on potentially divisive words. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 21:15, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Deletion on MfD
Hello, I have nominated your "No Bruins" template for deletion on grounds of violating policies on WP:UBX. AnAwesomeArticleEditor (talk) 00:58, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Hockey on the ice listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hockey on the ice. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. . Right now this links to bandy, which is quite ridiculous if you ask me. Hockey on ice is ice hockey, and the redirect should justifiably go to that page. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Thank you!
Markus Naslund, former captain of the Canucks | |
For being a huge part of keeping WP:CANUCKS alive and helping out with articles related to it -- thanks for your help! → The Pancakeof Heaven! 15:04, 8 June 2016 (UTC) |
I have cropped and then uploaded the picture especially for the article...space possibly are not a good reason to remove it!--Maher27777 (talk) 20:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Canuckian89. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Canuckian89. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 |