Jump to content

User talk:Canfan1964

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Canfan1964, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Canfan1964, good luck, and have fun. Mr. Rasel Hasan (talk) 19:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Dukeshire (November 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Tails Wx 01:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Canfan1964! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tails Wx 01:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kelly Dukeshire has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kelly Dukeshire. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 06:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess I’m a bit confused. The article was initially rejected citing lack of notability, even though this athlete has been inducted into multiple sports halls of fame and the citations demonstrated this (i.e., citing the hall of fame induction profiles).
So I aimed to include 2 newspaper articles for each major point (i.e., finals MVP, All-Canadian, 3x conference all-star). Each of the newspaper articles covers said point. But now I’m receiving feedback that this is citation bombing.
I guess I’m just confused on what reviewers consider to meet the notability standard. The initial comment indicated that induction into multiple sports halls of fame does not reach notability, but now news paper articles that establish the points that were reported in the halls of fame induction profiles constitutes citation bombing. I guess it’s unclear to me how to establish notability with these instances of feedback, which to me appear to conflict. Canfan1964 (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Dukeshire (November 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Dukeshire (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- RichT|C|E-Mail 20:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kelly Dukeshire (November 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citations - John Carson (basketball)

[edit]

Hi Canfan1964. Please don't add more than 2-3 citations to verify a claim. Refer to Wikipedia:Inline citation and Wikipedia:Citation overkill for more clarity. Happy editing <3 Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]