User talk:Camogie History

Welcome!

Hello, Camogie History, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

Please do not add "camogie player" after players' names. It is unnecessary and contravenes WP:NAME. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 14:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As he said. The normal principle is to have the person's name only ("John Smith", for example). If there is already something at John Smith, you have John Smith (camogie player). Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 00:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to reiterate what has been said above.. again. Please, be cautious and follow what we've advised. Ironholds (talk) 00:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Please do start taking notice of this- we do have naming guidelines, and it's best when our articles stick to them. If there is not an article at the person's name, just create it there. If there is, then the title should be Joe Bloggs (camogie player)- note the parenthesis and non-capitals. I guess you just haven't read these notes yet. Currently, people are moving the articles to the correct titles, but it would be great if you could just create them at the correct location in the future. Other than that detail, things look fine, so welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks a lot for your contributions! If you need any help, you're welcome to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 00:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As 4 other editors have pointed out, the titles you have been giving articles are a problem and it's creating work for others. Please read over WP:PRECISION and WP:NAME before creating any further articles. .--RadioFan (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Camogie History, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because This username implies some sort of an official designation. You should consider changing your username,. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. RadioFan (talk) 01:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Football History or Tennis History wouldn't cause anyone to bat an eyelid. Fences&Windows 01:22, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create pages with inappropriate titles, you will be blocked from editing. PLEASE READ WP:NAME BEFORE CREATING ANYTHING ELSE. RadioFan (talk) 01:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Therese Maher, Camogie Player, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PLEASE READ WP:NAME BEFORE CREATING ANYTHING ELSE. iBen^discuss 01:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Camogie

Hi there. I love the work you've done as the subject badly needs it. However, please do abide by guidelines. I found many of them strange when I first started but they are there for a reason. Plus the fact that, just like camogie, when you join a club you play by its rules. Please don't get browned off with the admins, as the sport badly needs you on Wikipedia. Gra mor, Fergananim (talk) 02:35, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arlene Cushen

The article Arlene Cushen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of meeting Notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 16:10, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nell McCarthy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Nell McCarthy, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://m.rte.ie/sport/gaa/2009/0218/camogie.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:47, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've created dozens of these articles, of questionable notability as is. Have you copied these from another source? Shadowjams (talk) 08:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Camogie Association

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Camogie Association, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Camogie Association of Ireland. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Camogie Association of Ireland a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 09:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Nell McCarthy has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Some text was directly copied from http://m.rte.ie/sport/gaa/2009/0218/camogie.html Triwbe (talk) 09:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Camogie Association of Ireland. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 11:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Joan O'Flynn.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Joan O'Flynn.svg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 10:53, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No articles for many names Many of the people mentioned have no article attached. Need to remove the link Pmunited (talk) 15:17, 11 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

External links

Thank you for all your contributions, you've done a lot of work. Unfortunately, in most articles the linkfarms in the external links sections are inappropriate, and should all be removed. I have done a good handful of them, but all the other articles will also have to be cleaned. You might want to have a look at our external links guideline, which shows you which links are, and which are not appropriate. Most of your links fail the point that they are not directly linked to the subject. E.g. on Áine Codd I have removed all the links to the association, the ball, and local websites. Only the first one is about Áine Codd, the others are about organisations that she is somehow related to, but not directly about her. Those links should be on their own wikipedia pages. I hope this explains.

Could you please help in making the external links sections in all the articles conform this? Thanks. And don't hesitate to contact me if you have further questions. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 15:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have tried to re-establish links where none exist. Please see notes above. Please remove links where none exist. Most of the schools in the colleges section have no links. Pmunited (talk) 01:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Caitriona Ruan to Caitriona Ryan

I assume that these are the same person. Mrchris (talk) 01:56, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Camogie History, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Camogie History (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Inaccuracies inserted in many camogie pages need to be corrected

Decline reason:

Yes, but ... you were blocked for a username violation, which this request doesn't address at all. Use {{unblock-un}} to propose a new username for yourself. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Daniel Case (talk) 12:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)}}[reply]

Nomination of Síle Horgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Síle Horgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Síle Horgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ww2censor (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eilish Redmond for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eilish Redmond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eilish Redmond until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSOleader (talk • contribs) 16:41, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin

The article Brídín Uí Mhaolagáin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I apologise for my choice of "fails" as the first word and have exchanged it for "does not meet". I hope this did not appear hostile to you. You do not seem to have edited for a while. Please include sources that are independent of the subject so that the article can be saved. Did her playing career consist of any senior inter-county games? Playing for UCD (or any university) is never enough for a separate biography. --Gaois (talk) 23:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chris O'Connell

The article Chris O'Connell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

--Gaois (talk) 01:11, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lil O'Grady

The article Lil O'Grady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 03:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mary O'Callaghan

The article Mary O'Callaghan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 03:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Síghle Nic an Ultaigh

The article Síghle Nic an Ultaigh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Belle O'Loughlin

The article Belle O'Loughlin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Gaois (talk) 23:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Agnes Hennessy

The article Agnes Hennessy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

--Gaois (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lily Spence

The article Lily Spence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

--Gaois (talk) 22:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peter Lucey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Lucey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Lucey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 12:59, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nell McCarthy

The article Nell McCarthy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phyllis Breslin

The article Phyllis Breslin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaois (talk) 04:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]