Jump to content

User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive57

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Was in the neighborhood

Hey CBW, wanted to let you know I was just up at Hope Bay (heading back next week), which is, if my geography is correct, just across the road from you (in relative terms). Cheers, --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:52, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

kelapstick. Indeed Hope Bay Aerodrome is about 120 km SSW of here. Prior to Covid there were quite a few people from here worked at the mine. Better visiting it now than in Decemeber to February. You get warm weather, by our standards, an 24 hours of sun. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:47, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
The last time I was in Nunavut previous was in 2001, and it was Jan-March (Up near Arctic Bay), so dramatically different. The folks on site said they canceled all the community flights due to Covid, not sure when they will restart them. Worth noting their protocols for getting to site are excellent. I will be heading back up on Wednesday for another week, will probably be back and forth for the next few months. --kelapstick(bainuu) 11:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Well it looks like it will be staying nice for the next little while so you should enjoy it. If over te next few months things open up and you land in Cambridge Bay drop into the CARS office, I might be a work. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Krishnadevaraya

Can you upgrade the protection of Krishnadevaraya from semi-protection to extended protection for a longer period due to edit warring and wp:disrupt. Thank you. Run n Fly (talk) 19:49, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Also, move protection extended is required because of this recently. Run n Fly (talk) 19:53, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Run n Fly. The last disruptive editing was 10 days ago. The move was in May and the disruptive editor is blocked. An increase in protection isn't warranted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:49, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Protecting a page

Hello! I am here to request that you add a semi-protection edit lock to the article List of Warriors characters because it is constantly being edited by unregistered/IP users, who do not make constructive edits, but instead add unneeded information that is poorly written. I apologize if this is the wrong place to ask for this, as this is my first time looking into getting an article semi-protected. I came to you because you are the person who semi-protected the Friday Night Funkin' article, so I figured you could be of assistance. Thanks! Blubewwy (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Blubewwy. Here is fine. You can also try Wikipedia:Requests for page protection but that can be slow. I semi-protected it for a week. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 10:10, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Ah, ok. Thanks! Blubewwy (talk) 17:16, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

RfC notice

This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog (talk) 10:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Request

I request to move Lego Monster Fighters (theme) to Lego Monster Fighters without leaving a redirect: unnecessary disambiguation. Striker2020 (talk) 07:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Striker2020 Done. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:41, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

People's Party of Canada

You can tell an election is in the offing as this article is once again been subject to on-going politically-motivated vandalism in an effort to sanitize it. Can you please "semi-protect" it until after the expected election on 20 September? Thanks. Ahunt (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Gone with three months}} CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
Super, that should do it. Thank you! - Ahunt (talk) 22:00, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Re: New Glasgow, Nova Scotia

Good to know. Thank you for telling me that, so I can correct the fault. But it is rather unsettling that that part of NRCan's website is not using HTTPS. --  Denelson83  00:33, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

The fault can now be corrected by using {{GCNDB link|key}}, where "key" is the five-letter code for the place in question. --  Denelson83  00:41, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

New NTS map sheet template

I have put together a new provisional template at {{User:Denelson83/Canada NTS Map Link}}. It uses the Kartographer extension with GeoJSON to plot the bounds of an NTS map sheet onto a dynamic map, and it also plots the location of a given feature on the map sheet. Do you think this would be any more useful than {{Canada NTS Map Sheet}}? --  Denelson83  03:07, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Can you give me a couple of examples? No rush as I'm just finishing up for the evening but I can check them out tomorrow. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 03:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  • 92F11 - Comox Glacier (Southern zone)
  • 77D2 - Cambridge Bay (Arctic zone)
  • 120G3 - Cape Columbia (High Arctic zone)
--  Denelson83  05:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
That seems to work better. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:26, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kincardine Municipal Airport logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kincardine Municipal Airport logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kincardine Municipal Airport logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kincardine Municipal Airport logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

Administrator changes

readded Jake Wartenberg
removed Emperor • Viridian Bovary
renamed Ashleyyoursmile → Viridian Bovary

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

EDITS MADE TO BORDER SECURITY FORCE PAGE ON WIKIPEDIA

Dear CambridgeBayWeather, This refers to the edits made by me in official capacity as Public Relations Officer of Border Security Force. The following edits were made at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/PROBSFDelhi The data is official, and may be verified with us at the following contact details.


As such, you are requested to approve the amendments made as part of contributions by PROBSFDelhi Email: pro@bsf.nic.in Mobile: +91-9560460460

Border Security Force Ministry of Home Affairs CGO Complex, Lodhi Road New Delhi - India

PROBSFDelhi (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)Krishna Rao PROBSFDelhi (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)PROBSFDelhi PROBSFDelhi (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

PROBSFDelhi. I am not contacting you to verify anything. That's not how this works. You need to provide sources to show that the information is correct. You can't expect, nor do you really want, every reader calling you up to verify that it was correct.
As I already said the material was copied and there is no way to show that you, PROBSFDelhi, have the right to release it.
As an employee of the BSF you have a conflict of interest and should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 11:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pilot Butte, Saskatchewan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Canadians.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
  • Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
  • The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

Miscellaneous

  • Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
  • The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Why did you revert my change?

Inuit isn't a synonym of Eskimo. The Eskimos are Inuits and Yupiks, so putting "Inuit" in the page of "Blonde Eskimos" is just wrong. The page was literally named "Eskimo" not "Inuit". And also if you revert, you're supposed to explain reverts. So can you explain it to me?

93.15.241.95 (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Please read Eskimo and Inuit. The word Eskimo, imposed on Inuit by outsiders (both Europeans and First Nations living in what is now southern Canada), is a outdated term that today is considered a slur and rarely, if ever, used in Canada and is falling out of favour in Alaska as well. If you read the Blond Eskimos article you will see that Christian Klengenberg called them that because Eskimo was in common use then. However, Vilhjalmur Stefansson preferred the more correct term Copper Inuit (Inuinnait). The people would have called themselves Inuinnaq (Inuinnaqtun to English Dictionary) or Inuit but not Eskimo. The article is at Blond Eskimo because that is what most of the sources use. However, DNA tests debunk blond Inuit legend, points out that they are Inuit.
By the way Inuk is singular, Inuit is plural and Inuits is the French (Canadian anyway) language word. Over a period of time Eskimo has become very derogatory and has led people to think that the Yupik people should be called Inuit as well. They are related but not Inuit. The funny thing is that today the majority of light haired Inuit, some are really blonde, in this area are the descendants of Christian Klengenberg. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)


Thanks for replying. So this page doesn't include Yupiks, right? Because by definition an eskimo is either an Inuit or a yupik. And honestly idk why Eskimo became derogatory. Most Native American tribe names are also exonyms but didn't become derogatory. In Russian for example it's widely used and not derogatory. I mean yeah it's a word introduced by outsiders but so is "First Nations" for the indigenous people of the Americas who live in the modern colonial state of Canada as opposed to those living in the colonial state of the USA... And honestly this makes everything harder because now there's no word for Inuits and Yupiks together (who had shared history and even genetics DNA). So the researchers who write on Eskimos, including the Inuits AND Yupiks now can't write anything at all... Although you may say that the word eskimo wasn't that accurate either because it didn't include the Aleuts who also had shared history and are part of one Eskimo Aleut language family... But that's besides the point. But please, next time, explain your changes because else someone might assume that you're just acting in bad faith and might just start an edit war. I wasn't a vandal, I just want to be accurate and to use the most precise language possible and not the most "politically correct". Including using the most common names and not just the ones who are actually used by that group, because I think it's the rules (MOS:ID etc). But I see that now "eskimo" is now not that common... But you can't always replace it with "Inuit" because it's not the same. 2A02:8440:840B:F4D0:0:1:9BF1:2801 (talk) 06:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

No the page does not include Yupik people just a small group of people on Victoria Island (Canada). Why shouldn't they be offended by a name that isn't theirs and was probably applied in a derogatory fashion. The point is that First Nations, which is specifically for one group of Indigenous peoples in Canada, is accepted by them and they don't want to be called Indian and there are worse names given to them by the Inuit. The Innu don't like being called Montagnais, even though Slavey is used here, many don't like it. No more than you would like being called George if your name was William. Dropping the use of Eskimo doesn't make things harder but more precise. You can use Inuit-Yupik or Inuit-Yupik-Aluet and people know who you mean. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:10, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

page: precipitation

Hi,

I want to inform you that i restore my version in the wikipage precipitation. For clarification: Just look at fig. 2 in cited paper (https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2018GL080298). There are no weather station in Africa or South America.

kindly regards, Rousseauumo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rousseauumo (talk • contribs) 19:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Circumpolar peoples

Hi Cambridge. I am asking you this here as I feel we are dangerously close to a small amount of progress on the Eskimo page and I don't want to open a can of worms. It may not sound like it, but I am seeking to be educated. The definition of Slur I find at List of ethnic slurs and basic internet searches is something said with the intent of being disparaging. In short sheep shaggier is a slur and CIS gender is a neutral descriptor some people get upset being called. I put Eskimo in the second box, all be it with far more sympathy for the offended. You put Eskimo in the slur box can you help me see that. Dushan Jugum (talk) 02:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Got reading your talk page above and it answered a lot, I shale leave this here for your entertainment?Dushan Jugum (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Dushan Jugum. I think it ranges from what some people think is a slur to mildly derogatory to some people just not bothered. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Yes it occurred to me that one can only plead ignorance for so long, before you are intending to be disparaging. Dushan Jugum (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Election

Wikipedia has never, ever had a consensus that we have to wait until MLAs or MPs are sworn in before we're allowed to start their articles.

For one thing, with rare exceptions the formal swearing in of newly elected MPs or MLAs is usually not reported as any sort of news story at all, meaning that there's usually no way for us to determine the exact date on which it happens — and even on the rare occasion when we actually can source an exact swearing-in date, we can't justify treating those few people differently than all the others for whom we can't. And for another thing, while it's true that new MLAs or MPs have to be sworn in before the new session of the legislature can actually meet, it's not true that they have to be sworn in before they can be called an MLA or MP. The practice here has always been that the new articles start happening literally within a few hours of the election night declarations: in every Canadian federal, provincial or territorial election that has ever happened during the entire existence of Wikipedia, there has never, ever been a single one in which the creation of new articles was postponed beyond the morning after election day at the latest.

And we don't even have a consensus that we have to wait on the results of a recount, either — we've had several instances (even one in the federal election just a month ago) where the new article was started about a new MP the moment the riding was called, and then had to be deleted a couple of weeks later when a recount flipped the victory back to the prior incumbent. In the event that happens, then we can cross that bridge when we get there — but we have never had a consensus that we have to delay starting the article about a reported election winner whose victory is subject to a recount past the time frame in which we're starting the articles about the ones whose victories were more unequivocal. The rule has always been that the article about the declared victor can be started right away, and in the event that a recount reverses the result (which has never really been as common as recounts upholding the existing result) then we deal with the changed circumstances as needed.

But I didn't "jump the gun" on any of this, I simply followed the standard practice that Wikipedia has always followed in all Canadian elections. Bearcat (talk) 13:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Where did you get the idea that I was talking about starting an article? That's not what I said. I'm saying that Wikipedia should not be declaring the results of the election until it is official. Of course an article can be started before the results are official. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
There's no separation between "starting the article" and "declaring the results" in a Wikipedia context — there's no way to start the article without "declaring the results", and there's no separate process to "declare the results" independently of starting the article, so it's impossible to somehow do one without simultaneously doing the other. There's no hair on which to split the difference between what you thought you meant and what I thought I heard, because in a Wikipedia context starting the article and "declaring the results" are one and the same.
It's also not standard practice to keep the retiring or defeated MLAs in the navbox past the end of the election results, either. The non-returning MLAs are not still "current" MLAs as of today; there's disagreement about whether a Canadian legislator who isn't returned on election day saw their term end on election day itself or on the date of the writ drop that commenced the election, but there's simply no such thing as a non-returning MP or MLA still being deemed as the "incumbent" MLA days or weeks beyond election day. There has never, ever been a practice on Canadian legislative navboxes of applying a temporary special format in the days after the election, in which the members of both the outgoing and incoming legislatures are listed as two separate lines and then the outgoing people are only removed several weeks after the election — and no, there's never even been any special Nunavut-specific exception from the standard process everywhere else either. The standard practice for Canadian legislatures has always been that as soon as the election results are in and the articles about the newly elected MPs/MLAs are getting started, the navbox gets updated to the new session's membership immediately. Bearcat (talk) 13:45, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Just because the government's website hasn't been updated yet doesn't constitute inherent proof that the non-returning MLAs are still "current incumbents" as of almost a week after the election. Updating the government websites takes time, and the process isn't necessarily completed there as quickly as it can be here. Even new federal MPs don't instantly have their new MP profiles uploaded to Parliament's website instantly on election night — for starters, their profiles have to be written before they can be uploaded, and for another thing, government websites have much more complicated content management systems than Wikipedia does, and fewer people to do the work than we do, so the process simply takes longer for them to complete. But that doesn't mean that outgoing MPs are somehow still incumbent MPs past election day just because the government's website hasn't been updated yet — if you want to prove that non-returning MLAs are still considered "incumbents" after election day, then you need to show me a source which features a full and precise post-October 25 month, day and year date for the end of their term, and the fact that the government's undated list of current members hasn't been updated yet just doesn't prove anything in and of itself.
Also, the question of who is or isn't premier is completely independent of the question of who are or aren't the MLAs — those are two different issues that don't have to match each other. Officers of the legislature (prime ministers, premiers, cabinet members) do still hold those titles in a caretaker capacity during the transition period from one government to a new one, regardless of whether they're legally still MPs/MLAs or not — but simple members of the legislature who don't hold officer titles aren't treated the same way. There isn't even any rule that a prime minister, premier or cabinet member in Canada inherently has to be an MP or MLA at all, so there's simply no conflict between "not an MP/MLA anymore as of October 25" and "still a prime minister, premier or cabinet member for another few weeks" — an MP/MLA can cease to be an MP/MLA on election day while still being a cabinet member for another few weeks after their term as an MP/MLA has ended; a defeated premier or prime minister (e.g. Stephen Harper in 2015) does still hold the first minister's role until his successor has been formally sworn in even if the new MPs are already considered MPs and the old ones aren't anymore; and on and so forth.
As I noted before, the problem with using "swearing-in" date as the start date of new MPs/MLAs terms is that for the vast majority of Canadian legislators the exact swearing-in date is impossible to source — the entire legislature is not necessarily sworn in all at once on the same day, and each individual legislator's swearing-in does not get reported as news, and even the government websites themselves don't make any effort to document each individual legislator's personal swearing-in date for posterity either. So for most Canadian legislators, there are only two things it's possible for us to do: either we use election day itself, or we just document the terms by year only and rip any mention of months or days out of their infoboxes entirely, because the election day is the only sourceable date that exists. And just because you might be able to source an exact swearing-in date for Nunavut's MLAs in particular doesn't mean we can treat Nunavut's MLAs differently than we treat everybody else — the rule cannot be that we use election day for federal MPs and 750 of Canada's 772 provincial MLAs while using a later swearing-in date only for Nunavut's MLAs. We have to have a consistent practice across the board, which means either we use the election date for all of Canada's 14 federal, provincial or territorial legislatures, or we strip month and day and use only the year for all of Canada's 14 federal, provincial or territorial legislatures. Swearing-in date is simply not available as an option, because for the vast majority of Canadian legislators we have no way to locate that information at all, and the very few people for whom we can locate it can't be treated differently than the overwhelming majority for whom we can't. Bearcat (talk) 15:22, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Correcting the birthday of Bruce Rockowitz

Hi, The birthday for bruce rockowitz is incorrect. Please change to 1st of November 1958. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedmunds97 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 2021 October 31 (UTC)

Tedmunds97. You need a source that show the 1 November date. Currently the source says 24 October. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 12:41, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

"Past and Future Airlines serving YVR" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Past and Future Airlines serving YVR. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 31#Past and Future Airlines serving YVR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Kaseng55 (talk) 19:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Dawson Creek Featured article review

User:Maclean25 has nominated Dawson Creek for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Gugundhabe

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Glane23, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Gugundhabe, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gugundhabe.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Glane23}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Geoff | Who, me? 21:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Eskimo

I like your idea of turning the Eskimo page into a term page for the word as we have "main" articles for all the circumpolar peoples. Looking at others that are lighter in tone then Negro or Ching chong... like Chukhna or perhaps even lighter tone like Bule it seems possible. We would need a large explanation of current use and those that accepted/embrace the term. Let's see what happens with the lead rfc come back to this in a few months.Moxy- 05:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

"Bobby Laurie" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bobby Laurie. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 9#Bobby Laurie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rusalkii (talk) 20:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Inuit navigation

Thanks for noticing my work on Inuit navigation. In the map section 'vegetable' was a poor choice, which I have changed to 'plant' and added sources of plant dye and references. Berries arn't vegetables but still in the edible section. The south and central Pacific Ocean are my usual areas of interest. I have recently done work on Polynesian navigation and added Micronesian navigation. I will leave it to others to expand Inuit navigation (MozzazzoM (talk) 11:34, 2 December 2021 (UTC))

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).

Administrator changes

removed A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

Technical news

  • Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
  • The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа!

Hello, CambridgeBayWeather! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:55, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas CambridgeBayWeather

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas
and a very happy and healthy New Year,
Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,
   –Davey2010Talk 17:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Share similar holiday wishes by adding {{subst:User:Davey2010/MerryChristmas}} to your friends' talk pages.

Songs of the season

Holiday cheer
Here is a snowman a gift a boar's head and something blue for your listening pleasure. Enjoy and have a wonderful 2022 CBW. MarnetteD|Talk 18:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

County-inator SPI forthcoming

I am crafting a sockpuppet investigation for the 2601.3D09.E110-series IP-hopper that we spoke about at Talk:List of regions of Nunavut#Centre or seat as a result of continued disruptive persistence on misapplication of the county concept and seats throughout Canada. Most recently the administrative office locations of nearly every BC regional district article were referred to as seats. In June, I started a similar SPI but it was cancelled as I filed it on an IP redirect. I had pinged you on that as an involved editor at that time but you did not comment before it was cancelled. Any feedback for me on the previous SPI attempt before I finish off and submit my current SPI prep effort? Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 08:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

SPI initiated at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Canadiancounties. I know you are an admin that is involved with this sock so you can't weigh in from the admin perspective but you are affected in the editor capacity. Not sure if that allows you to comment as an other user. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 22:50, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Hwy43 I looked through everything. I think the best thing would be to ask at WP:ANI or WP:AN for a range block. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 23:31, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. I will do this after the SPI runs its course. As the one registered editor subject to the SPI has a website posted to his user page, I had collected a bunch of evidence through web searches that support a strong connection between him and the modus operandi of the IPs, but I got spooked about WP:OUTING. In fact, I am glad I noticed the warning about outing before saving my report or I may have brought on unexpected trouble for myself. Do you happen to know if I can WP:CONTACTCU to submit that evidence so that privacy of the individual is protected? Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 00:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Hwy43. I think you can but you might be best asking one first. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
I will, and I just started an ANI too. See it at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I haven't implicated the one registered editor in the ANI and won't unless the SPI concludes socking. The registered editor is either truly not linked and simply shares the same interests or is the IP's Dr. Jeckyll (hope the former). Hwy43 (talk) 01:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Reindeer bulls and cows

I notice the IP has removed all (but one) mention of bulls and cows. Since that's what they are commonly called, I think they went too far. What's your opinion?

Even before I learned this, when hunting them in Greenland, I noticed how their behavior and nose were so reminiscent of cows. They're very curious, and I've had them approach as close as 4-5 meters. I'm not sure how widespread this is or if more species (than the Barren Ground in west Greenland) have this, but at least one I shot had a bare, flat, wet nose, just like a cow. -- Valjean (talk) 17:53, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

I thought it a bit odd but I wasn't sure how common that was for reindeer compared to caribou. I think that the article could do with changing "caribou" to reindeer for consistency. Caribou would appear in the lead as an alternate name and in quotes and the names of particular herds. They are curious here as well and tend to approach. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
What about the bulls and cows matter? -- Valjean (talk) 07:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
It could be restored if that is the common term. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:21, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
It's used enough in scholarly and other sources to be worth adopting here. I'm going to do it in most instances, although not necessarily in all. -- Valjean (talk) 21:51, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Sounds good. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 20:06, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Hello CambridgeBayWeather:


Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:51, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A t-shirt!
A token of thanks
Hi CambridgeBayWeather! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk ~~~~~
A snowflake!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, CambridgeBayWeather!

Happy New Year!

CambridgeBayWeather,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Talk 00:22, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

The WikiEagle - January 2022

The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,910 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The functionaries email list (functionaries-en@lists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jolly1253 (talk) 13:07, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Fresh Cream - Spoonfull Cream clip.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fresh Cream - Spoonfull Cream clip.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Alberg 30 once again

Happy New Year. Hope you have some daylight there!

Sorry to trouble you again. You previously protected this article, as it was the target of long term, persistent IP vandalism. Since the protection ended the vandalism has returned and remains extremely persistent. The previous use of "pending changes" did not slow things down and created more work constantly denying them. Would it be possible to just indefinitely "semi-protect" it to prevent IP editing? I believe the tenacity of the vandalism warrants this approach. Thank you for your consideration of the issue. - Ahunt (talk) 02:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Gone for 3 months. You should probably start the talk page discussion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. Not sure how you discuss flagrant vandalism. - Ahunt (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Just explain why it's a problem. They may never respond but you made the effort. Like Talk:List of regions of the Northwest Territories#Regional office or seat. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:52, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Okay, will do. Thanks for all your help on this. - Ahunt (talk) 18:57, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 Done - Ahunt (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

History merge request

Hi CBW, I hear from Synoman Barris that an administrator can do history merges of article builds done in a sandbox into the actual articles. Do you have the know-how and willingness to do the following?

Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 06:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Hwy43. Sure. I've done the first. You will need to go over them to set the most current version. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Thanks. I have no idea what "to set the most current version" means! Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 07:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I also moved some (Goobies, Green Island Brook, Green's Harbour, Hopeall and South Dildo) to the undisambiguated titles. I just meant as to which is the correct version. See here. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 07:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Got it, and good work on the undisambiguation moves as well. Hwy43 (talk) 07:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

"School 25" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect School 25 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 18#School 25 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alberta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C Train.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Double-redirect" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Double-redirect and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 1#Double-redirect until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:49, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed suppress in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections.
  • The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Wandal, Vijayapura

Can you remember why you WP:BLARed Wandal, Vijayapura in November 2018? That link is called in two articles, Basavana Bagewadi and Vijayapura district. There are three places in Karnataka on DAB page Wandal, and this looks different from any of them. It looks to me as if the blanked article should be reinstated, and added to the DAB page.

(The problem has only just come to light because you redirected Wandal, Vijayapura to Wandal, Karnataka; which was then the title of Wandal, Nidagundi, but following a recent move has been redirected to the DAB page (and quite right too, there's no WP:PTOPIC).) Narky Blert (alt) (talk) 15:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

I'm not really sure but I think at the time Wandal, Vijayapura and Wandal, Karnataka were identical articles. See User talk:HARISH S Kalagi and Wandal, Nidagundi history. I'm not seeing a lot of difference between the current Wandal, Nidagundi and Wandal, Vijayapura as it was in 2018. So I'm not sure that it should be restored. Am I missing something? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:31, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
The coordinates are identical. One major difference is the taluka the V and N places are said to be in - Basavana Bagewadi and Nidagundi respectively. I'd seen that TP, with its redlinks to two deleted articles with misplaced commas. It seems best to retarget Wandal, Vijayapura to Wandal, Nidagundi; and I've done so. Let me know if you disagree. Narky Blert (alt) (talk) 17:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
No problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 19:48, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Miss Teen Earth

Dear Editor, on several occasions the user Aayat1998, of Indian origin, has been deleting information or destroying articles. This time he moved the article from Miss Teen Earth, the official name of the pageant, to Miss Teen Earth International, since he intends to make believe that there is another Miss Teen Earth pageant and that it is a separate pageant organization. An administrator placed an indefinite protection on the article Miss Teen Earth, the same one that has been celebrated as such since 2012. As editor of the article, I request that it be renamed Miss Teen Earth since that is the real name of the contest and the title that the winner gets annually. Also that an administrator place a warning to the user Aayat1998, for wanting to maliciously to hinder the work of other editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yahsabaot (talk • contribs) 00:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Disraeli Gears - Strange Brew Cream clip.ogg

Notice

The file File:Disraeli Gears - Strange Brew Cream clip.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

portion of "Strange Brew (song)" heard in sample not proven contextually significant to the whole song. possibly easily conveyed and/or summarized in text.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

About Wind Chill

I just saw you modify the value of the wind chill in some urban climate data, and the value was changed from a decimal to an integer. That's because the English version of the Environment Canada website shows differently in French.

The French version retains a decimal place[1], while the English version is an integer[2]. Albert Tachibaña (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Also the French name of wind chill is "Refroidissement éolien". Albert Tachibaña (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Albert Tachibaña. That's odd but usable. The source would need to be added to each article that used wind chills with decimal places. Currently the decimal place is unsourced. See here. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ French Version
  2. ^ English Version
CambridgeBayWeather In addition, some of the unwanted weatherbox pages you mentioned should be abolished if they are only used for one page. I'm writing an article on Hokkaido's climate though, see Draft:Climate of Hokkaido. Please ask you below, are you interested in the geography of Japan, especially the climate, thank you! Albert Tachibaña (talk) 14:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Albert Tachibaña. I have no intention of tagging the templates for deletion. I saw you were busy with editing Japanese articles and you need time to add them to different things. I recently created some for Alberta, Canada and they are used in the city and Geography of Alberta. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 14:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive57&oldid=1079963170"