User talk:CallieCrewmanAuthor

Welcome!

Hello, CallieCrewmanAuthor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Adakiko (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Anne Wilson (musician), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 18:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Elizabeth Olsen has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. LADY LOTUS • TALK 14:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Synthesis

Please do not use synthesis. Nothing was mentioned about her family. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Anne Wilson (musician)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Anne Wilson (musician), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Matrix Revolutions plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at The Matrix Revolutions. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 04:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ashley Olsen. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I encourage you to read the following guidelines: WP:NONAME and WP:BLPNAME, which concerns your addition of a celebrity's child's name in the article. Wikipedia sides with the privacy of celebrities and their family lives, and you are advised not to continue adding Ashley Olsen's child's name in the article per the two guidelines I cited, as well as privacy issues. Continuing with this addition will result in further warnings and possibly a block. You are also verging on edit-warring, so please stop. MPFitz1968 (talk) 03:05, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Please have a look also at the information at this page, which appears every time you edit J. K. Rowling. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:03, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are edit warring on a contentious topic. Please see WP:EDITWAR and the notice above; if you continue, you are likely to be blocked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:53, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Better than Revenge, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Please also note that per MOS:IRELEV, photos are only added if they are contextually related to the text they are meant to accompany. Please refrain from adding photos for purely decorative purposes. Ippantekina (talk) 04:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Elizabeth Olsen did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! KyleJoan^talk 16:59, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Felton.

Hey there. Can you update Tom's recent movie, Some Other Woman, because he played Peter in there? Thnx. 182.255.42.6 (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Are you asking me to update Tom Felton's Wikipedia page to include information on the film? Or are you asking me to edit the Some Other Woman page? If it's the latter, I don't see anything worth changing. I hope to hear back from you soon! CallieCrewmanAuthor (talk) 20:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was asking you to update Tom's page because it said TBA on it. Can you do that? 182.255.42.6 (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say "TBA"? CallieCrewmanAuthor (talk) 14:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 2023 next to Some Other Woman. It has not been updated ever since. 182.255.42.6 (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the late reply. I added that Tom Felton was in Some Other Woman to his Wikipedia page. Is that what you wanted? CallieCrewmanAuthor (talk) 00:30, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi CallieCrewmanAuthor. Thank you for your work on Mary Kate Morrissey. Another editor, Bruxton, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 04:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) CallieCrewmanAuthor (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Funcrunch (talk) 16:23, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gladys Pearl Baker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marca. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taylor Rousseau Grigg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taylor Rousseau Grigg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylor Rousseau Grigg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TJMSmith (talk) 01:52, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]