User talk:CRBW

Welcome!

Hello, CRBW, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Valfontis (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Oregon

You are invited to join WikiProject Oregon, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to the U.S. state of Oregon .

You received this invitation because of your history editing Oregon articles or discussion of Oregon topics. The Oregon WikiProject group discussion is here.
If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page, and add your name to the list of participants. New members may read about existing members and introduce themselves here.

Valfontis (talk) 22:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope Abbey

I suppose that you did not see my previous response about the cemetery. That is that SmackBot only (by and large) dates such templates rather than adding them.

However you raise some valid points about biting newcomers. There are two aspects to this: firstly the adding of the templates. These are not meant to be reprimands or warnings but to encourage all readers of an article to address its shortcomings - and most articles have significant shortcomings one way or another at the moment. In particular the editor who added these tags commented "needs work--I'll try to get around to it soon". The second aspect is the wording of the templates. Bearing in mind that they are targeted at a wide audience, in most cases significant effort has gone into keeping them short, simple, and to the point, and providing links to help pages on the clean-up in question. If you think that the wording can be improved, you are welcome to suggest alternatives on, for example Template talk:Refimprove.

Clean-up tags serve another purpose though, and that is to categorise articles into hidden dated clean-up categories, such as Category:Articles needing additional references from February 2011. These are used by the various task-forces to try and ensure that all clean-up jobs do eventually get done. Rich Farmbrough, 21:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, CRBW. You have new messages at Talk:Hope Abbey.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Valfontis (talk) 03:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]