User talk:CM670

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

CM670, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:36, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello CM670, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Birmingham Barons have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Memphis Redbirds managers

If you'll take the time to read the prose and table at Memphis Redbirds#Managers, you'll see that it covers managers for past seasons only. They have played 19 seasons from 1998 to 2016. During that time, they have employed six managers. Not seven. Six. Manager number seven came on in 2017. After the season, the 2017 manager will be added and the seasons count updated to 20 and the manager count to 7. NatureBoyMD (talk) 01:03, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation template

You can basically copy the templates I used at Memphis Redbirds and change the information to include the source you are using to cite information you add. The MiLB.TV citation can be used as is (changing the date as needed) for all teams that are currently streamed via the service. It looks like this:

<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.milb.com/milb/multimedia/index.jsp?affiliateID=MiLBmenu |title=MiLB.tv |publisher=Minor League Baseball |accessdate=July 24, 2017}}</ref>

-NatureBoyMD (talk) 23:31, 24 July 2017 (UTC) Thanks I was just looking for the template.[reply]

July 2017

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Birmingham Barons. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Since you requested a specific example, the edit summary of this edit is a clear, blatant, and unacceptable personal attack. —C.Fred (talk) 23:39, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ User:C.Fred That depends on what the definition of is is.

@C.Fred: Based on his previous comment, I do not think he gets it. ChiSox2005 (talk) 23:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 23:58, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on Black Lives Matter

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Black Lives Matter. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nblund^talk 20:25, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Robert-Maddox1999.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Robert-Maddox1999.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 03:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Troy Champ 1968.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Troy Champ 1968.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom-Jones1958.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tom-Jones1958.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 23:58, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlie-Bradshaw-1960.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlie-Bradshaw-1960.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content rationales

Regarding this revert of my image removal, you should review WP:NFCC. and in particular, WP:NFCC#10c. Every non-free image must have a separate non-free usage rationale for each article in which the image is used. File:Bill Atkins Troy State.jpg only has a rationale for its use in Bill Atkins (American football). I have nominated the file for discussion. You can provide your comments at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 October 19#File:Bill Atkins Troy State.jpg. -- Whpq (talk) 01:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tom-Jones1958.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tom-Jones1958.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:13, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Charlie-Bradshaw-1960.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charlie-Bradshaw-1960.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:21, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of the hatnote on Texas Bowl

Hello,

I have reverted and restored your removal of the hatnote message (the short note placed at the top) on the Texas Bowl article.[1] Your edit summary that it is "irrelevant since they are no longer the sponsor" is an insufficient reason for its removal. Here is a basic summary of the Wikipedia policies and guidelines as to why this is needed.

Per the rules of Wikipedia:REDIRECT: "AdvoCare V100 Bowl" was the former name of this bowl game, so a redirect page called AdvoCare V100 Bowl was created. Again, it does not matter if they no longer sponsor the Texas Bowl. It still is a former name, and readers may not know that it has changed.
Per the rules of Wikipedia:HATNOTE: A hatnote (the one you attempted to remove) is intended to help readers locate a different article they might be seeking. Again, even though AdvoCare no longer sponsors any of these bowls, readers may not know that fact. So someone may enter "AdvoCare V100 Bowl" into the search engine, and thus the hatnote is there to provide distinction between the two bowl games previously sponsored by AdvoCare.

So again, just because AdvoCare no longer sponsors these bowls, they are still former official names, and we must still accommodate and help readers who may be still entering these historic names into the search engine, or reading websites that link to these older names.

Thanks. Zzyzx11 (talk) 20:10, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CM670. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CM670. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Loser

That’s You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:6A83:C200:6CB6:CB2A:1B37:87DF (talk) 22:45, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]