User talk:CAMiller62

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/The Daisy Chain (historical novel).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 06:40, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/The_Daisy_Chain_(historical_novel)

Howdy from Texas. I wrote a draft of an article, mistakenly submitted two similar pages for the same article. Saw you note about the duplication and recommending deleting a duplicate. Thank you for catching my hiccup.

"This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Daisy Chain (historical novel), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one."

Now, it appears that the original article is not now in the Wiki system either. When I click on the link in your note, I get a Wiki pg message that Wiki does not have an article with this title. Just want to make sure one copy of the article is in the review process. Casey Miller, Dallas, TX 03:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CAMiller62 (talk • contribs)

Hiyas there CAMiller62,

What you are seeing is a bit of a mistake on my side actually. When marking an AFC submission as duplicate it require a parameter stating which page the article is a duplicate of. This parameter automatically assumes that the page is in the wikipedia talk namespace, so you only have to enter the pages name. Having said that - i copy-n-pasted the entire page name including "Wikipedia_Talk:" into the template, which caused it to break.

On a more positive note - the page is currently still in the review queue. You can see it here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Daisy Chain (historical novel) (Now with a free, working link while the supply lasts :) ) Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 06:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum: I just checked, and it seems your page is almost at the top of the review queue now. So i guess it will be checked fairly soon. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 06:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

The Daisy Chain (historical novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Electriccatfish2 (talk) 00:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I have added the {{Notability}} tag to your recently created artcle The Daisy Chain (historical novel). Please see the article's Talk page for some pointers to what is missing. (If you wish to respond, please do so here or, better, on the article's Talk page.) HairyWombat 18:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Daisy Chain (historical novel) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Daisy Chain (historical novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daisy Chain (historical novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Question

I hate to ask this, but are people paying you to create articles about them? I could be more indirect but I've noticed that (assuming this is the same Casey Miller) you work in social media and advertising. There's not exactly anything strictly against the rules about creating articles that you were paid to create, but you still have to show notability per Wikipedia's guidelines. In most, but not all, cases the companies and persons asking to have an article created often lack the notability needed, which is why it's so often discouraged for paid editors to create articles. You create articles that eventually get deleted for lack of sources and it creates work for the other editors on Wikipedia. I recommend that you look into WP:COI as well, since if you are getting paid to create articles then that would be a big conflict of interest.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, CAMiller62. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:54, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of UmbrellaBank.com

The article UmbrellaBank.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to pass WP:CORP, a search doesn't bring up anything to show this bank branch is overwhelmingly notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for UmbrellaBank.com

An article that you have been involved in editing, UmbrellaBank.com , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. HairyWombat 15:53, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:CAMiller62/Winterizing a swimming pool

User:CAMiller62/Winterizing a swimming pool, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:CAMiller62/Winterizing a swimming pool and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:CAMiller62/Winterizing a swimming pool during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 11:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Advancial Federal Credit Union (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too much emphasis on products and services. Add all available third party independant coverage (look for news stories about the mergers for example).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CAMiller62! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 02:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Advancial Federal Credit Union (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is largely sourced to the company's own website and non-RS like payscale.com.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chetsford (talk) 03:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 22:10, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Advancial Federal Credit Union (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft's only independent sources are "assessments" that are trivial coverage, largely meaningless, and do nothing to demonstrate notability. Contrast this with the range of sources for Chemical Bank, a good encyclopedia article about a financial institution.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 15:19, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Advancial Federal Credit Union

Hello, CAMiller62. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Advancial Federal Credit Union".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]