User talk:Bulgakoff

Image copyright problem with Image:M-A Fog.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:M-A Fog.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:M-A Fog.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:M-A Fog.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:M-A_Fog.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:M-A_Fog.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tormentor

thanks for changing it, i wasnt sure because i thought that bearing in mind that he plans to help infernus i wasnt sure what the implications of that was cos i know he has been involved in projects with both gaahl and infernus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpmuscillo (talk • contribs) 22:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

also, is sykelig not going to be touring with the band in future? 84.65.195.202 (talk) 11:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gaahl told me that Sykelig won't be touring with them anymore. Bulgakoff (talk) 19:37, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fair enough, i think sykelig was just doing em a favour but hes got his own band.--Gpmuscillo (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 09:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Demo 2002

I have nominated Demo 2002, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 2002 (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Demo 2002 (Orcustus album)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Demo 2002 (Orcustus album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 2002 (3rd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? B. Wolterding (talk) 16:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One of your images for Commons?

Hello. Sorry for my poor English... I would very mutch like to use the Image:Frost live with 1349.jpg at Swedish wikipedia, for the article on Frost. I saw that you are the photographer. Could you consider to upload the photo at Commons too? That would be very nice. BiblioteKarin (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) BiblioteKarin (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Tormentorbw.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tormentorbw.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ridiculous. All this info is in the image description page already. I took this photo personally, no matter what some other use might believe or not. Bulgakoff (talk) 21:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Forces of Satan Records artists

I have nominated List of Forces of Satan Records artists, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Forces of Satan Records artists. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. OlEnglish ^(Talk) 11:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Orcustus logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Orcustus logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Demo 2002 (Orcustus album)

I have nominated Demo 2002 (Orcustus album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demo 2002 (Orcustus album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:40, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jonas Raskolnikov Christiansen

I have nominated Jonas Raskolnikov Christiansen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonas Raskolnikov Christiansen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SnottyWong ^squeal 19:16, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Septem (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Septem (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Septem (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 02:31, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Flame

- Black Flame (band)#Full-length albums

Hi, I merged it to here for the time being, if it sells well or charts we can give it its own article , right now imo it isn't noteworthy enough. Regards. Off2riorob (talk) 12:55, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Imperivm.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Imperivm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gaahl & King picture

I felt the article needed a picture of the two becauz (a) they wer in the band for quite a long time and (b) they'r mentiond a lot in the Quantos Possunt ad Satanitatem Trahunt section. I thought the picture of them playing live was the most fitting. Why does it matter that they wer (later found to be) using the name unlawfully when the picture was taken? Surely we'r not breaking eny laws just by putting the picture in the article? ~Asarlaí 08:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Black Flame.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Black Flame.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 19:52, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Septem-album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Septem-album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:World Dirtnap.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World Dirtnap.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Forces of Satan Records.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forces of Satan Records.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Death... Is Just the Beginning V for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death... Is Just the Beginning V is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death... Is Just the Beginning V until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rorshacma (talk) 07:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wrathrash

The article Wrathrash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wrathrash.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wrathrash.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]