User talk:BubbaFritz

May 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Cathy O'Brien (conspiracy theorist). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —DIYeditor (talk) 14:30, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P O :)

That's okay, working on those "legal edits" now and blocking me wont help stop everyone else from stepping up unfortunately. BubbaFritz (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone else? Is this some sort of threat? Doug Weller talk 16:39, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cathy O'Brien (conspiracy theorist)‎, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 16:38, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P O 3 :)

a threat? Not even in the slightest. Your edit history is public, and it seems like alot of people are "vandalizing" this page. BubbaFritz (talk) 16:48, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So is yours. No one is vandalizing this talk page. Doug Weller is an administrator, meaning he has been entrusted by the Wikipedia community with the power to block editors, for instance. Your two article edits were indeed NOT in agreement with our guidelines. It does seem like you are offering a threat, which is kind of futile, and makes it only more likely that you will run into a block, unfortunately. 16:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Drmies (talk)[reply]
You should reply in the same section as what you are responding to and insert one more ":" (or "*") than the comment you are replying to has so it will be WP:INDENTed. This article does attract a lot of vandalism because there are more than a few people who for various reasons are convinced there is mind control of this nature. This is not the mainstream view and it is not supported by reliable sources. —DIYeditor (talk) 16:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P O

I was really hoping it was. We're working on getting that all fixed up for you now. :) BubbaFritz (talk) 16:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P O

I have to ask though, with the CIA already admitting it ran and operated a mind control program called MKUltra (listed right on their website) how is it disproven or dismissed by public media? BubbaFritz (talk) 17:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cathy O'Brien doesn't allege anything that sounds like what is known about MkUltra (which ended long ago). —DIYeditor (talk) 17:09, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

F O 1

Because there are PLENTY of reports, paperwork and government documents saying this program was true. This whole page needs to be rewritten with UP TO DATE information, not your bogus sources from the 1990's. BubbaFritz (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

F O 2

Ah, so because you think it sound bizarre. People can really see who's calling the shots now. Thanks :) BubbaFritz (talk) 17:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last chance to explain what "P O" and "F O" mean. Drmies (talk) 17:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cathy O'Brien (conspiracy theorist).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Cathy O'Brien (conspiracy theorist) was changed by BubbaFritz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899004 on 2018-05-16T17:26:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

F O 3

Ah, an actual threat. BubbaFritz (talk) 17:27, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 17:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P O 5

Just as I was hoping for. Thanks! BubbaFritz (talk) 17:44, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think any of us were fooled by your PO and FO. We were just wondering if you had the balls to say it explicitly. No surprise that you didn't. Doug Weller talk 17:52, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. So you came here only to troll. Good riddance then. Drmies (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]