User talk:Bsenim
New article
[edit]Hello! I see you are a new editor, and there are a couple of things you need to know. First (simple), every time you add a comment to a talk page, you need to "sign" it: simply put four tildes ~~~~ at the end.
Secondly, Wikipedia is not for publishing your own ideas, regardless of whether they are true, and it looks as though this is your own idea. Unless you can show people talking about a circle of seventh chords somewhere published, the article will almost certainly be deleted. (I hope you keep copies of stuff you write somewhere for your own reference.) Hope this helps! Imaginatorium (talk) 15:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- fair enough, but why not allow wikipedia to introduce undiscovered ideas? Seems like many missed opportunities for helping "truths" be discovered more efficiently. If a post on Twitter gets enough retweets, will this constitute as being published? Or do I have to get an article published to have my idea entered into wikipedia? Bsenim (talk) 15:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am taking the liberty of copying our conversation from the article page, because it will almost certainly soon disappear. I'm not sure if it is WP:LEGAL to move someone else's comment, so if you object, please just delete it. But it seems more constructive to continue here... Imaginatorium (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- It appears to me that this "topic" is entirely "original research". The initial claim that: "The Circle of fifths is closely related to all the Major and minor 7th chords." has no support, and seems to be vacuous. The sequence of notes that you show consists of alternating steps of 4 and 3 semitones; 4+3 = 7, a perfect fifth, so all this means is that you have added thirds in the middle of each fifth of the cycle of fifths. The problem is basically the strong law of small numbers, in this case 12. Imaginatorium (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- In regard to the field of number theory, I agree with describing my circle as vacuous. But if that is true, then the circle of fifths is also vacuous. The reason the circle of fifths is even an article or talking point worthy of having a wikipedia page is due to the usefulness of visualizing the fifths as a drawing. 4+3=7 is not groundbreaking in any context, but having a single synthetic scale or sequence of notes that one can practice is useful in the same way visualizing the fifths on a circle is useful. Bsenim (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, this sort of indicates the problem. If WP were completely open-ended, anyone could add anything they thought relevant, it would be a lot worse than it is now (where there are problems enough). How to decide whether something is worthy/useful? WP has decided that the "notability" criterion means that it must have already been discovered and talked about in publications. We (two) can't easily agree whether your scale is helpful, because "helpful" is just too subjective. I'm quite happy to argue a bit though. The circle of fifths is significant, because any TET system must provide a good approximation to the perfect fifth, which is a frequency ratio of 2:3, and this approximation must also be a divisor of a number of octaves, i.e. a power of 2. So it is all about finding solutions to the approximation 2a ≈ 3b. 12TET gives the approximation a=19, b=12. And this can conveniently be played on a piano keyboard. Adding extra notes in between doesn't obviously explain anything, and the problem is that you could add any combination of extra notes; for example simply the diatonic scale, so on the piano you just play a major scale inside each fifth. I don't think you have justified your interpolation as being significantly more useful or interesting than any other. Imaginatorium (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Are you a musician? Bsenim (talk) 16:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- You definitely have a strong background in math. I have an engineering background, so I can appreciate your analysis. I asked if you were a musician because I think you are missing the value in practicing a single synthetic scale on a musical instrument. Muscle memory is difficult to achieve for all the modes, so having a single 24 note sequence that contains all the major and minor 7th chords is very useful in jazz. Bsenim (talk) 17:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Well, this sort of indicates the problem. If WP were completely open-ended, anyone could add anything they thought relevant, it would be a lot worse than it is now (where there are problems enough). How to decide whether something is worthy/useful? WP has decided that the "notability" criterion means that it must have already been discovered and talked about in publications. We (two) can't easily agree whether your scale is helpful, because "helpful" is just too subjective. I'm quite happy to argue a bit though. The circle of fifths is significant, because any TET system must provide a good approximation to the perfect fifth, which is a frequency ratio of 2:3, and this approximation must also be a divisor of a number of octaves, i.e. a power of 2. So it is all about finding solutions to the approximation 2a ≈ 3b. 12TET gives the approximation a=19, b=12. And this can conveniently be played on a piano keyboard. Adding extra notes in between doesn't obviously explain anything, and the problem is that you could add any combination of extra notes; for example simply the diatonic scale, so on the piano you just play a major scale inside each fifth. I don't think you have justified your interpolation as being significantly more useful or interesting than any other. Imaginatorium (talk) 16:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- In regard to the field of number theory, I agree with describing my circle as vacuous. But if that is true, then the circle of fifths is also vacuous. The reason the circle of fifths is even an article or talking point worthy of having a wikipedia page is due to the usefulness of visualizing the fifths as a drawing. 4+3=7 is not groundbreaking in any context, but having a single synthetic scale or sequence of notes that one can practice is useful in the same way visualizing the fifths on a circle is useful. Bsenim (talk) 16:20, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Circle of major and minor 7th chords
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Circle of major and minor 7th chords requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 16:03, 19 December 2024 (UTC)