User talk:Bricks&Wood

Bricks&Wood, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bricks&Wood! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

File move requests

Please include the files extension in your suggested new name, its just easier to C/P the new requested name. Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 21:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done File:AsFriendsRust-ThePorchDays.jpg, incomplete rename request, no file extension included. May re-file with correct format - FlightTime (open channel) 18:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And slashes are not allowed in filenames. Consider using LuckyRename for requests. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 08:16, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Morning Again has been nominated for deletion

Category:Morning Again has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bricks&Wood

Thank you for creating The Porch Days: 1998 to 2000.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:01, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bricks&Wood

Thank you for creating Moonlight Survived.

User:LunaEatsTuna, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Fantastic work! Just a quick note—I notice Discogs is cited once in this article. As Discogs is a crowdsourced website that is editable by users, that means it is not a credible source for Wikipedia. Are you perhaps able to find a better source in its place? Other than that, the rest of the sources look sufficient. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|LunaEatsTuna}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 04:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Culture

Just wanted to let you know about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Culture (US band) (2nd nomination). If you are interested in restoring the band's article, you may find the deleted history of the article useful in reconstruction. Chubbles (talk) 03:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Greatest Hits?

Hello, Bricks&Wood,

Thank you for creating Greatest Hits?.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

There are numerous unsourced statements, which require inline citations per WP:BURDEN.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meena}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

– Meena • 21:35, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Damien Moyal has been nominated for deletion

Category:Damien Moyal has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 15:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bricks&Wood

Thank you for creating Charm Offensive.

User:Yeeno, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Well done. The reception section should be expanded to include more praise/criticism of the music itself, rather than just the labels and wording critics used.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Yeeno}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yeeno (talk) 18:51, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Won (As Friends Rust album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Won (As Friends Rust album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 20:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Won (As Friends Rust album)

The article Won (As Friends Rust album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Won (As Friends Rust album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Won (As Friends Rust album)

The article Won (As Friends Rust album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Won (As Friends Rust album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. VickKiang (talk) 23:38, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Young Trophy Band in the Parlance of Our Times

You had my attention at a hardcore band's work being nominated for GA, and I thank you for giving me someone new to listen to. However, I also have my concerns after reading the feedback on the failure of Won (As Friends Rust album). Would you like me to review this GA nomination, or do you expect a similar result? If the latter is the case, I am giving you a chance to simply remove it, if you wish. dannymusiceditor ^oops 20:48, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As Tradition Dies Slowly

Hi @Bricks&Wood, I restored the redirect to the band on this page because as of now, there are no independent reviews of the album, which is likely the easiest way to demonstrate notability per WP:NALBUM. If you want to try to find some sources you might be able to recreate it, but as it is I don't think the album is notable based on the sourcing. Alyo (chat·edits) 19:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Morning Again - As Tradition Dies Slowly.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Morning Again - As Tradition Dies Slowly.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Young Trophy Band in the Parlance of Our Times

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A Young Trophy Band in the Parlance of Our Times you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 22:00, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stay Black

This does not alter the fact that this is heavily reliant on Done's own words, press releases from his record label, irrelevant back story, and webzines which do not pass WP:RS. It might pass notability, but it would have to be drastically cut down to remove everything that comes from unreliable sources. And presumably you wouldn't agree to that either. Richard3120 (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tension (hardcore band) has been nominated for deletion

Category:Tension (hardcore band) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:32, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of A Young Trophy Band in the Parlance of Our Times

The article A Young Trophy Band in the Parlance of Our Times you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:A Young Trophy Band in the Parlance of Our Times for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 05:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:On Bodies has been nominated for deletion

Category:On Bodies has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 07:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Record label cats

Is there any consensus to empty Category:Recording artists by label and diffuse it by the nationality of the company? Compare, e.g. Category:Albums by artist, which is a listing of all artists and Category:Albums by artist nationality, which allows you to find things by the national origin of the artist. There are similar schemes for other creative works. I wanted to get to this before you get too far in diffusing. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:33, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Williams (musician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Joshua Williams (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:07, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PSOTY has been nominated for deletion

Category:PSOTY has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:10, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NONENG

Hi. Regarding your comments on Draft:Alan Enileev, please read WP:NONENG. While we prefer the use of English-language sources if available, this is by no means a requirement. Curbon7 (talk) 05:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Business (record store) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Business (record store), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Business (record store) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Obelisk (magazine) (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Interviews involving the founder or the magazine itself are considered to be primary sources and can not be used to demonstrate notability. All the trivial mentions in other sources and the contents published by the creator aren't suitable sources either. Multiple significant coverage from independent and reliable sources are needed to prove that it passes WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. If suitable sources are not included in the next submission, considering how much time this page has been deleted, this draft should be rejected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Obelisk (magazine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List requirements - Significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject

The list of albums have a requirement mentioned at the top of the page for every list. The requirements state "These albums are (1) original, i.e. excluding reissues, remasters, and compilations of previously released recordings, and (2) notable, defined as having received significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject." Please note that it is not sufficient to have one reliable source, which I challenge that The Obelisk is a reliable source. It must be significant coverage. After much discussion on the list talk pages, we narrowed it down to significant is three good sources or better. I was outvoted, as I wanted five good sources to equal significant. For List of 2015 albums, I have stated twice that the album released by Vision Eternel in 2015, Echoes From Forgotten Hearts, does not have significant coverage. The next issue is whether The Obelisk counts as one good source, and I have stated that it is a blog and does not count, and you have stated that it is used over 100 times in Wikipedia and no past discussions listing the webzine as an unreliable source. I have gone to Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources, and there is no listing of The Obelisk on the page, neither for reliable or unreliable. It is not a mainstream source. It is not listed under generally reliable sources, and has not been vetted by the community. I do not accept it as one of the three valid sources required to show notability for the album listing on the List of 2015 albums. I will continue to delete the album listing, but I wanted to reach out to you and explain why it is being deleted, as my conversation in the edit summary page was not sufficiently detailed to convey why it was being rejected. Mburrell (talk) 03:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American melodic hardcore musical groups by state

A tag has been placed on Category:American melodic hardcore musical groups by state indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PSOTY members has been nominated for deletion

Category:PSOTY members has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 19:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bricks, once the members category is deleted, I don't see a need for Category:PSOTY either. The songs and albums subcategories already interlink with one another and the only other related article is the discography. The navbox and album images are not articles. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:30, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Vision Eternel

Template:Vision Eternel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:PSOTY has been nominated for deletion

Category:PSOTY has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 09:40, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pierrefonds, Quebec, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joshua Williams (musician)

Hello, Bricks&Wood. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joshua Williams (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Thank you for your edit to 2024 in Canadian music. When editing an article, make use of the edit summary. It helps people know what you've done. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:50, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also add albums to List of 2024 albums not just 2024 in Canadian music. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 04:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harmonium en tournée, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Les cinq saisons

Looking at the various issues of this release, it appears its official title was "Les cinq saisons", and that the longer title is a subtitle included in the liner notes. https://www.discogs.com/master/13096-Harmonium-Les-Cinq-Saisons

Hi, I know Michel Normandeau, one of the original members of the band, and he confirmed to me today that the actual name is "Si on avait besoin d'une cinquième saison". It was abridged for the disc label as "Les cinq saisons" which was usually used by most fans. But that is not the actual title, the longer one is ! JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 01:38, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JeanPaulGRingault, that's cool that you know Normandeau personally. However, Wikipedia requires properly-sourced references for this type of information; hearsay cannot be used. In this case, all of the publications of the era (Billboard, RPM, Record World, Montreal Gazette, La Presse, Le Soleil, etc) all refer to the album as Les cinq saisons. That is in addition to the album covers, sleeves and center labels. If you can find a published source (maybe like an interview with the band) in which they specifically say that the longer title is the official one, then it can be changed. I could find no such evidence from my extensive research. I also plan to expand the article considerably from this research.--Bricks&Wood talk 03:10, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Serge Fiori's authorized biography, the main creator of the album, it is systematically refered to by its intended name (the chapters title is "Si on avait besoin d'une cinquième saison"!). It is even explained that it is generally refered to with its shorter moniker. I cannot believe you still stand by your decision of renaming the page and your invention of the concept of a subtitle ! That article has now the wrong title and a major discrepancy. You are 100% wrong, not my opinion but plain fact. Please fix. JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 11:17, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited This Is It: The Best of Faith No More, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Andy Wallace and Matt Wallace.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bricks&Wood. Thank you for your work on Kiss the Blood Off My Hands (novel). Another editor, SafariScribe, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this. Kudos!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 00:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Badgley

Saw your last edit, and OK, if that's the case, then please add the relevant reference to the List of people from Toronto, because his article says he grew up in Oshawa and only mentions that he went to school in Hogtown. (edit) And if that's the case, please also edit the article for Mr. Badgley to say something similar. PK T(alk) 19:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dark Horse Records: The Story of George Harrison's Post-Beatles Record Label

Hello, Bricks&Wood,

Thank you for creating Dark Horse Records: The Story of George Harrison's Post-Beatles Record Label.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I could not really find any WP:SIGCOV of this book by a quality independent WP:RS? You would need some kind of review of the book by a major national source to confirm WP:GNG. thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 21:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Aszx5000, thanks for reviewing the article and sharing your concern with me. I see what you mean and understand that at first glance it may appear that way. This is a music book, it's about a record company. So the coverage it receives is different from fiction publications. For music releases, Record Collector, It's Psychedelic Baby Magazine and The Spill Magazine have all been recognized as reliable sources for album reviews. All three have covered this book, so I believe that those should be counted in favor of this article. There are new articles/interviews being published every couple of weeks about this book/author so I will keep looking on my end and add anything else that I can find. Please let me know what you think! Bricks&Wood talk 06:50, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also added another review I located from The Vinyl District which is considered a reliable source in over 230 other Wikipedia articles at the moment. Bricks&Wood talk 10:57, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me B&W - keep an eye out for any mainstream reviews (mainline English newspapers) which are also helpful, but what you have shown is a fair threshold imho. Nice job! Aszx5000 (talk) 11:07, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello, I'm CatTits10. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mixtapes (band), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CatTits10 (talk) 08:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Faith No More tribute albums

A tag has been placed on Category:Faith No More tribute albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:56, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]