Jump to content

User talk:Briangotts/archive 2010-12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

[edit]

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Input request

[edit]

Ancient Roman inquires

[edit]

Your input would be appreciated at

Thanks.--Doug Coldwell talk 20:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

[edit]

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:JosephRabban.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:JosephRabban.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment of Tong Yabghu

[edit]

I have done a GA Reassessment of Tong Yabghu as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article does not currently meet the current GA standards. As such I have placed the article on hold for one week pending work. I am notifying you as the primary editor of this. You can find my review here. Should you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Thank you. H1nkles (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, may I ask for advice?

[edit]

I know you may not be directly concerned with such a matter, but I get lost in the help, and conflict resolution and whatnot pages, so I take it on me to bother one who should know better for direct advice. I have a little dispute about the proper content of Excalibur_(film)#The_Charm_of_Making with user:wrotesolid who keeps pushing nonsense thesis about the actual nature of this particular piece of popular culture, and since it seems I'd be the first to do a 3rd revert, I think I'd better ask for advice concerning the proper channels to solve this conflict. Thanks for your attention --Svartalf (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

[edit]

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

[edit]

Hey! I notice you have made many maps for Wikipedia. Just wondering how do you make and edit maps? Thanks! Angrybeerman (talk) 13:44, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Quickfire

[edit]

Hello, I see that you created the page Quickfire, which I recently "adopted" and expanded in the scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Norse history and culture. As I noted in the discussion page there, I wonder if there is a difference between quickfire and a "regular" arson - does piling additional material to set fire to the house have something to do with it ?

It is the first time, in fact, that I encounter this term of "quickfire", and I haven't found it in scientific literature about ancient Scandinavia (whether as "quickfire" or as "kveiking"). Thus, I wanted to know if you could point me to where you found this term. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be best to rename the article to something like "arson in medieval Scandinavia". Thanks in advance, and cheers ! --Alþykkr (talk) 03:51, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

John Hunyadi

[edit]

Can you please solve the vandalism problem at this page, user http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Squash_Racket is erasing comments on the discussion page, he violates the facts on the article even if the other concensus is achieved on the discussion page. Can you please check it out, if not, who should i address with this problem? Thank you.188.2.97.229 (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iadrian yu (above IP) evades his block he received for edit warring. Squash Racket (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, he follows me. User:Iadrian yu we live in the same city, i am not registered but i am trying to prevent page valdalism after i saw that user banned. Just because we live in the same city means i can`t edit wikipedia? And the fact that http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Squash_Racket is manupilating even the discussion page is outrageous.188.2.97.229 (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
User:Iadrian yu (above IP) evades his block he received for edit warring.
They live in the same city and happen to edit extremely similarly. Squash Racket (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is extremely similarly that we live in the same city? Do you even realize what are you talking about? Lol. After you vandalize the article you are making generalizations now188.2.97.229 (talk) 18:20, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Case (temporarily) solved. Forget this. Squash Racket (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator elections have opened!

[edit]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

[edit]

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgars

[edit]

hi, i need protection about "Bulgars", the article is under attack by Slavic nationalists. they want to remove all sources in the entrance. thanks for your help.--Finn Diesel (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Britain 500 CE.png

[edit]

You have forgotten a parenthese in your file : "NEUSTRIA (FRANKS". Dadr (talk) 11:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

[edit]

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:06, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)

[edit]

The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:24, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Su (Basque) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per the talk page, there is little or no evidence that confirms article content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Technopat (talk) 23:46, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)

[edit]

The June 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Baasha ben Ruhubi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a search for references on "Baasha ben Ruhubi" found only mirrors and items that appear to come from this article. There are no G book hits other then a single mirror of Wikipedia. Fails WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIII (July 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

New parameter for military conflict infobox introduced;
Preliminary information on the September coordinator elections

Articles

Milhist's newest featured and A-Class content

Members

July's contest results, the latest awards to our members, plus an interview with Parsecboy

Editorial

Opportunities for new military history articles

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio (no, copy and paste)

[edit]

Looks to me as though this is yours: [1]. Originally added here [2]. It's caused me quite a bit of work. Dougweller (talk) 18:07, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looking again, Hirsch's book is from the Jewish Encyclopedia, so it's just old, possibly out of date, and uncited plagiarism. A harsh word, but I think it's a terrible idea to copy and paste from century old sources even if it is legal. And it reads as though it was written over a century ago too. Dougweller (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outrageous. Please do your research before you start throwing baseless accusations of plagarism. The article that I formatted clearly states that it comes from the Jewish Encyclopedia. See the bottom: "This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, a publication now in the public domain." There is even a Wikipedia template for this: {{JewishEncyclopedia}} Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 01:04, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • A Comment? I think maybe all Doug is saying is that 100 year old sources can be dated or can have difficult prose to interpret...or are wrong?. Its not a copyvio, certainly. But maybe you should ask him what kind of difficulty the source caused him...as in was there parts of the work which was wrong or are really dated today compared to 1906? Historical interpretations do change over time. I'm sorry but I don't edit much here on wiki nowadays as I'm usually at Commons where I'm a trusted user there. Wikipedia can be very "hard on one's health" with all the edit wars and sockpuppetry. I edit generally on Ancient Egypt which most people ignore. Thank You sir, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:18, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm more or less done with WP myself, but do not tolerate accusations of copyvio when I have clearly followed established WP guidelines. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 01:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Which is why I made the 2nd post. Clearly to my mind would be a template at the top of the page where people would be more likely to see it, preferably suggesting that editors might want to make the prose readable, find more modern sources, etc. Yes, you've technically followed our guidelines, but it would be a better article if it was not just copy and paste. As it stands it could never be a Featured Article without being completely rewritten. Dougweller (talk) 05:51, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. I never said it should be a Featured Article. Any article ported over from JE is necessarily a placeholder. If you want to improve it and get it to FA status, more power to you. But I will react very harshly and strongly to accusations of malfeasance, especially plagiarism. Your second post, which you continue to cite to vindicate yourself, accused me of exactly that. A simple apology (which you have yet to supply), rather than harping on issues nobody is arguing about, would suffice. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 16:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Ok, I apologise for the plagiarism accusation - (let me point out that by 'uncited' I mean no inline citations in the JE stuff) but I still think a stub is better than this sort of thing. I think if you'd spent a few minutes smoothing out the prose to make it more readable, cutting some of it perhaps, it would have been better. Dougweller (talk) 17:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I accept your apology, and encourage you to be more careful about using that word in the future. As for the rest, (1) I like the prose, (2) the article was in the public domain, and (3) I have no interest in improving it further. I think the idea that a stub would be preferable is laughable. You are free to make whatever changes you feel are appropriate. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 20:06, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LIV (August 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The return of reviewer awards, task force discussions, and more information on the upcoming coordinator election

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants

Editorial

In the first of a two-part series, Moonriddengirl discusses the problems caused by copyright violations

To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cover - Man Who Came Early.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cover - Man Who Came Early.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Milhist election has started!

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies talk 21:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radhanite

[edit]

I have nominated Radhanite for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Jan 1922 (talk) 19:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)

[edit]


The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue LV (September 2010)
Front page
Project news
Articles
Members
Editorial
Project news

The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals

Articles

A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles

Members

Our newest A-class medal recipients, this September's top contestants, plus the reviewers' Roll of Honour (Apr-Sep 2010)

Editorial

In the final part of our series on copyright, Moonriddengirl describes how to deal with copyright infringements on Wikipedia

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eate has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

this was created in June 2005 and has not grown since. The only source was deleted as erroneous and research found no reference online to a god namned eate. This article is not notable and quite possibly misinformation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarkDask 17:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

[edit]




To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus on 'Controversy' section of 13th tribe

[edit]

So Brain, How do you propose we arrive at a consensus on the perceived bias and impartiality of the 'Controversy' section of 13th tribe?Mystichumwipe (talk) 22:28, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:17, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Khazars -> Khazar Empire

[edit]

The Khazars article has been move to Khazar Empire. As you are (by far) the largest contributor to this article, I thought you might want to comment about it here: Talk:Khazar Empire#Recent move from "Khazars" to "Khazar_Empire". Jayjg (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

[edit]

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

[edit]

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Viking expansion map?

[edit]

Hi! I believe you made the first version of the File:Viking expansion.png map. Do you remember what source it is based on? Kindly Mange01 (talk) 09:29, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance

[edit]

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on August 7, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 7, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article directors Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:37, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Four Award
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Rus' Khaganate. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just rewrote both these articles that you created, and I have proposed merging Tiermes into Horagalles. The discussion is set up to happen at Talk:Horagalles#Proposed merger. I see from your user page that you are basically inactive, but in case you should see this, I would welcome your input. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:50, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Habbani Jews

[edit]

Hi. I'm trying to remove the picture of king Abdullah from the article "Habbani Jews". The picture depicts king Adbullah with his bedouin (muslim) servants. The source of this picture is: http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/HU034170/ruler-of-kerak-with-servants?popup=1

From there it was downloaded by "grandmaster Yehoshua Sofer" and used to promote his new fantastic family history: http://www.abirwarriorarts.com/gallery2/v/movies/Abir_Qesheth_Hebrew_Warrior_Arts.html

The people on the picture are not Habbani Jews. Please help me to stop this revisionism. (Rider In The Storm (talk) 13:16, 26 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]

The article Euri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

the article has been labelled {{dubious}} since August 2005; in all that time no reliable source has been found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  --Lambiam 14:04, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Fiction based on or inspired by Beowulf

[edit]

Category:Fiction based on or inspired by Beowulf, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 15:56, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:55, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

[edit]

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Piram has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the general notability guideline: appears to be one in a list of kings within the Bible not discussed by external reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lagrange613 21:56, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FAR Sargon of Akkad

[edit]

I have nominated Sargon of Akkad for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.--Zoeperkoe (talk) 04:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abu Haftzah Yazid for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Haftzah Yazid is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Haftzah Yazid until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J8079s (talk) 02:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:15, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

[edit]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:45, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Talmud translation in a section of an article I translated (Sura Academy)

[edit]

Hi,

I saw you were the one who originally wrote the article Talmudic Academies in Babylonia, and since I didn't get an answear from User talk:Chesdovi I would like to ask for your help on one section of an article which i'm not sure of its translation(on Sura Academy articele) :

  1. Exedra ([אכסדרא] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help), a covered way leading up to the house of learning, open at both sides, as if a divider between the city's streets and the academy).
  2. Kittun ([קיטון] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help), rooms that served for the special needs of the Rabbis and teachers of the Yeshiva academy).
  3. Ginata ([גינתא] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help), an Orchard green garden, which its produces served as a support for the academy and its disciples).
  4. Tzipi ([ציפי] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help), mats serving as a resting place for the Yeshiva academy, and for vacations). Only a short time after the foundation of the Yeshiva academy of Sura, it became more influential than the Nehardea Academy.

the #1 i'm sure of, since I found the translation to it it on http://www.halakhah.com/, however, #2, #3, and #4 are simply litrans from the Hebrew article, and would like to ask you to tell me weather they are correct and to find the right translation to it.

Thanks in advance, --Midrashah (talk) 18:49, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

[edit]

Dear Briangotts,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.


So a few things about the interviews:

  • Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
  • Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
  • All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
  • All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
  • The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.


Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk)23:23, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Levant c 830 map

[edit]

Hi Brian,

From what I understand, you are the original author of the Levant c. 830 map [3], which has been copied and updated since. A version is currently being used in History of Palestine among other places. I have been trying to establish if there is an original RS that verifies the map and was wondering if you may be able to shed some light on the subject. Dlv999 (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion: help preventing edit war, solving conflict

[edit]

Dear Admin, please give your opinion here, it would be most welcomed: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#William_Muir.27s_opinions_in_Life_of_Mahomet

Thanks in advance--Misconceptions2 (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:02, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:52, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:26, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph Azar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 03:29, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Khvaliskoye has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced for 4 years, and not notable - we do not need article for all previous names in all languages for all geographical entities, and there seems nothing to suggest that this word should have a Wikipedia entry.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 18:48, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Agrippa II.jpg

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agrippa II.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:09, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Main page appearance: Rus' Khaganate

[edit]

This is a note to let the main editors of Rus' Khaganate know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on August 19, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 19, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The Rus' Khaganate was a polity that flourished during a poorly-documented period in the history of Eastern Europe (roughly the late 8th and early to mid-9th centuries AD). A predecessor to the Rurik Dynasty and the Kievan Rus', the Rus' Khaganate was a state (or a cluster of city-states) set up by a people called Rus', who might have been Norsemen (Vikings, Varangians), in what is today northern Russia. The region's population at that time was composed of Baltic, Slavic, Finnic, Turkic and Norse peoples. The region was also a place of operations for Varangians, eastern Scandinavian adventurers, merchants and pirates. According to contemporaneous sources, the population centers of the region, which may have included the proto-towns of Holmgard (Novgorod), Aldeigja (Ladoga), Lyubsha, Alaborg, Sarskoye Gorodishche, and Timerevo, were under the rule of a monarch or monarchs using the Old Turkic title Khagan. The Rus' Khaganate period marked the genesis of a distinct Rus' ethnos, and its successor states would include Kievan Rus' and later states from which modern Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine evolved. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you see this message before 19th August, you might want to give your view on whether the blurb should run with an accompanying image or not. The discussion is at talk:Main Page#Image for a forthcoming TFA - opinions requested. Regards, BencherliteTalk 10:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

[edit]
Norse history and culture
Thank you for donating quality articles such as Rus' Khaganate and Kylfings, for starting the project Norse history and culture, for covering Israelite and Jewish history, for related images, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator election

[edit]

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the projectwhat coordinators do) 08:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:26, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:58, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]