User talk:Breawycker/Archive 5
 | This is an archive of past discussions with Breawycker. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| < Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 > |
| All Pages: | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 - ... (up to 100) |
|
Thanking you for informing me about a file source
Hello sir, I'm deeply thankful for reminding me about putting an appropiate file-source information of File:SC53.jpeg. I carelessly wrote internet as the source, and soon I completely forgot that. I've now put the proper information. You can go check it.--Soumit Banerjee (talk) 08:21, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Thank you--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 20:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Your motto
Don't forget to come back and rate the motto! I hope you like it. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 02:09, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Would you mind leaving comments on the motto at the motto request? Knowing what wasn't good about it would be helpful. Leave comments at the request, not here. Hi878 isn't home. (Can I take a message?) 16:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Editor review
I've reviewed you. You should come and check it out. Buggie111 (talk) 03:51, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Buggie111 (talk) 22:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 18 April 2011 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:13, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
Motto again
Hopefully, this one is better. :) Don't forget to rate it! I put it all into a new request, just so you are aware, so rate in the new section, not the old one. ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 04:39, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
Don't forget to rate it, my dear sir. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 20:12, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
re sorting my userpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 01:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
About revision deletion
{{adminhelp}} Why was my revision deleted on User talk:MuZemike?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 14:06, 24 April 2011 (UTC)tt page.
Can you provide a diff? According to the logs you don't appear to have edited that page. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:42, 24 April 2011 (UTC) [1]--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 17:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC) [2]--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 18:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
- Your edits reverted vandalism, which would have been visible in the left side of the diff. Deleting your edit summary wasn't really proper, since it doesn't fall under any of the criteria for redaction, but I suppose MuZemike wanted to remove all evidence of the vandalism. It would normally imply that MuZemike considered that your edit summary was "purely disruptive", "grossly insulting", or met one the other criteria, however. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 19:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Assistance: Barry Conrad Southgate
Hi,
If you could please
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
help me improve the "Barry Conrad Southgate" article, I would really appreciate it.
Thank you. (Csunstudent123 (talk) 03:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC))
- There are many valuable suggestions regarding this at Help:Drawing attention to new pages. Helpme templates are not really the best way to go about asking for help improving articles. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 04:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- I guess I could help you if you want.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 22:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Amber Riley at the 2011 NAACP Image awards.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Amber Riley at the 2011 NAACP Image awards.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en
wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en
wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 00:26, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
May 2011
I noticed the message you recently left to Chayzz Devyant. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. While I agree that the article meets CSD, I do not feel the edits you marked constitute vandalism. You went straight to Level 3 and 4. The editor is editing his own page. Thanks, and happy editing!!! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 13:36, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
CSD nomination for Plunkettball
Just a quick FYI, you tagged Plunkettball for speedy deletion based on CSD A7. The article is about a game, so A7 criteria are not applicable, as such, I removed the tag. If you wish to pursue, please use PROD or AfD. Thanks, and happy editing!!! jsfouche ☽☾Talk 01:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)