User talk:Breawycker/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Breawycker. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Hi! I recently wanted to create a new article in "Tensile structure" section, My article was named "Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours". My article was momentaly deleted with the motivation "it is nonsense or gibberish". Tell me, please, how can you know the information about things, which you not saw? It's not correct! One example of the big series of "Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours" you can see in the file:Quartet_1.jpg (Wikipedia store). Is it really "nonsense and gibberish"? Answer me, please. March 5, 2011 Segrim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Segrim (talk • contribs) 16:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
"nonsense and gibberish"
Hi! How and why I got the patent on the ctructure, which is "nonsense and gibberish"? Look: http://v3.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/mosaics?CC=SU&NR=1270256A1&KC=A1&FT=D&date=19861115&DB=EPODOC&locale=en_EP" - Patent "SU №1270256 А1" invention description from the European Patent Office. March 5, 2011 Segrim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Segrim (talk • contribs) 16:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Can you remind me what you put on that page before I deleted it. My memory is awful.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 17:44, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
- Firstly I wrote only name of the article. Secondly I added to article the file:Quartet_1.jpg. I intended later add the main text to the article. In both occasions my article was immediately deleted. --Segrim (talk) 15:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- You could of used {{increation}}, {{Under construction}}, {{New page}}, or started it on your user page and moved it or requested it to be moved.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 00:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- If you start it in your name space, and work on it untill it's a good enough to be an actual article, tell me and I will unprotect it and move it to Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours. How does that sound?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 20:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- See also: Help:Userspace draft, {{Userspace draft}}.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 22:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- I can't quickly work with English. Earlier I not wrote any article with your markup language. But you usually delete all quickly. May I simply write a good article in Word about my nets and my designs and send it to you for publication by e-mail?--Segrim (talk) 04:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- 5 March my materials were fully removed from the page Wikipedia with the formulation "you need at least one reliable source for this: removing till that happens". I gave you proof such as Mason Pack conclusion. If it's not enough, look my site, chapter "Publications" and you will find there another (second) proof. Today all 6 my designs were fully recognized as "tensegrities" (Look tensegrity page at Wikipedia Commons). It means that I am right. If this page's writer not right understood Fuller's principles - this not my blame. I appeal you: undone removing my materials from Wikipedia "Tensegrities" and I shall write the beginning of this chapter so, that it will become right (in Fuller's sense).--Segrim (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
You can make it in word and then e-mail to me, or you can do what I suggested above.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 20:59, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi! I want to write article in Word. In what kind of style I must do it? As my works describing (from myself)? Or as Wikipedia correction? (such variant you already have)? As an article "Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours'? Or in other style? Can I refer to my photos in your store? How I can send additional photos? Answer me this questions, please.--89.191.115.46 (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- Why you not want to undid deleting of my changes? Segrim
- Answers:
- In what kind of style I must do it?
- I'm not sure what style you should use. I guess you could look at related article, until you find a style you think fits.
- As my works describing (from myself)? Or as Wikipedia correction? (such variant you already have)? As an article "Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours'? Or in other style? Can I refer to my photos in your store?
- Can your rephrase these questions, please? How can I send you additional photos?
- If you want I will send you a special (not my normal e-mail) e-mail address, so you can send me the photos, unless they're on wikipedia, then you can just place below this message. Hope what I answered was helpful--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 19:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- While Rememberway not undo removing of my information from the page "tensegrity" (5 march) I have no any words. Hi! --Segrim (talk) 19:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- What?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 23:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Your system is weak. Who should I contact with the real suggestion of the serious inventions or discoveries? To whom should refer FOUNDER? By your rules, I have only one way - to the coffin. You are ready to support only small shifts. That I'm not interested. Real progress in science, you basically are not allowed. Why are you sitting in this place. With your own head you can not evaluate NOTHING. I feel sorry for you. Think you serve God or mammon. You are no longer interesting to me. Sorry..Segrim —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.191.115.46 (talk) 19:28, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- What?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 23:45, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- While Rememberway not undo removing of my information from the page "tensegrity" (5 march) I have no any words. Hi! --Segrim (talk) 19:01, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- If you want I will send you a special (not my normal e-mail) e-mail address, so you can send me the photos, unless they're on wikipedia, then you can just place below this message. Hope what I answered was helpful--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 19:15, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Answers:
- Why you not want to undid deleting of my changes? Segrim
- Hi! I want to write article in Word. In what kind of style I must do it? As my works describing (from myself)? Or as Wikipedia correction? (such variant you already have)? As an article "Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours'? Or in other style? Can I refer to my photos in your store? How I can send additional photos? Answer me this questions, please.--89.191.115.46 (talk) 18:59, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- 5 March my materials were fully removed from the page Wikipedia with the formulation "you need at least one reliable source for this: removing till that happens". I gave you proof such as Mason Pack conclusion. If it's not enough, look my site, chapter "Publications" and you will find there another (second) proof. Today all 6 my designs were fully recognized as "tensegrities" (Look tensegrity page at Wikipedia Commons). It means that I am right. If this page's writer not right understood Fuller's principles - this not my blame. I appeal you: undone removing my materials from Wikipedia "Tensegrities" and I shall write the beginning of this chapter so, that it will become right (in Fuller's sense).--Segrim (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- I can't quickly work with English. Earlier I not wrote any article with your markup language. But you usually delete all quickly. May I simply write a good article in Word about my nets and my designs and send it to you for publication by e-mail?--Segrim (talk) 04:57, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- See also: Help:Userspace draft, {{Userspace draft}}.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 22:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- If you start it in your name space, and work on it untill it's a good enough to be an actual article, tell me and I will unprotect it and move it to Cable-stayed nets on the wave-like contours. How does that sound?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 20:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
- You could of used {{increation}}, {{Under construction}}, {{New page}}, or started it on your user page and moved it or requested it to be moved.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 00:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Firstly I wrote only name of the article. Secondly I added to article the file:Quartet_1.jpg. I intended later add the main text to the article. In both occasions my article was immediately deleted. --Segrim (talk) 15:07, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Hey Breawycker. I have a question on your page protection request over at WP:RFPP. Could you respond? Thanks. —GFOLEY FOUR— 20:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
I have withdrawn my request.--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 23:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Thank you for responding. —GFOLEY FOUR— 00:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
My file
I see you have requested deletion of my file but I just found out that there is a bunch of technical stuff you have to go through so you can just go ahead and delete it. I have already put the author request deletion template on it to make it easier, Thanks. Jessy T/C 00:12, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
October Wikification drive
|
The Working Wikifier's Barnstar | |
| This is given to Breawycker for his eighth place appearance on the leaderboard. Congratulations! Nolelover Talk·Contribs 02:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
|
The Bronze Wikification Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is also given to Breawycker for wikifying 47 articles. Thanks for your work -- Nolelover Talk·Contribs 02:50, 9 November 2011 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Input requested
WT:New editor feedback#Proposed office hours. Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 21:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, thank you, thank you for adding images to Pillow Pets. How did you know that images needed to be added? Bulldog73 talk da contribs go rando 03:18, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- I just was searching for it and I noticed that it needed images. Why do you ask?--Breawycker (talk to me!) 22:02, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- I don't really know. Bulldog73 talk da contribs go rando 02:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)