User talk:Bravedog

Please stop changing the images on List of Big Brother housemates (UK series 7), unless images you wish to replace the existing ones with are of the same aspect ratio and have a full fair use rationale and source information. —JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 18:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove maintenance and deletion tags from images or articles. Thanks. —JD[^{don't talk}|_email] 19:10, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bonnie.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Bonnie.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:GraceBigBrother7UK.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:GraceBigBrother7UK.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MikeyBigBrotherUK7.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:MikeyBigBrotherUK7.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Shahbazbigbro.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Shahbazbigbro.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Bb7uklounge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bb7uklounge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:ChandlerBingPilot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:ChandlerBingPilot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:JoeyTribianniPilot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JoeyTribianniPilot.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Apprentice -> The Apprentice (US TV series) move

Wikipedia has clear procedures on moving pages. Other than in exceptional circumstances all pages should be moved by following the instructions on the Requested Moves page. Unilateral moves can trigger edit wars, break links and cause a lot of problems. Please stop unilaterally moving pages, as you did with The Apprentice, and follow the correct procedure. -Anþony 03:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a move request to revert your move. If you would like to offer a reason for the move, you may contribute to the discussion at Talk:The Apprentice (US TV series)#Requested move. -Anþony 04:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:PrincessNikki.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:PrincessNikki.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ Bigr Tex 21:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:ApprenticeBadger.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ApprenticeBadger.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PIKKIHEAT.JPG

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PIKKIHEAT.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bb7uklounge.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Bb7uklounge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Tra (Talk) 22:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Dalton

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. SteveLamacq43 12:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Radio City Music Hall 08-01-2006.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Radio City Music Hall 08-01-2006.jpg, by Twice25 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Radio City Music Hall 08-01-2006.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

NCD

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Radio City Music Hall 08-01-2006.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:The_Apprentice_Launch-Hewer_Sugar_and_Mountford.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:The_Apprentice_Launch-Hewer_Sugar_and_Mountford.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. But|seriously|folks 16:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2007_August_14#Jimmy_Wales

Hiliarious yet stupid attempt to go after WP's founder. Bearian 01:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD tag on Jimmy Wales

Please stop putting an AfD tag on this article. You claim that Mr. Wales does not qualify for either notability or verifiability, but this is obviously untrue. A simple Google search will pull up over 2 million references to him, to his projects, to his charity work, to his life, and he is most certainly worthy of a biography article. The references most certainly pass the reliable sources test, as he's been reported by such major publications as Time, The New York Times, and many others as seen in the article. I respectfully request you stop placing AfD tags on this article. Thank you. ^Ariel♥Gold 17:46, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Edits like this one show that you're not here to improve the encyclopedia. If you cannot find a way to contribute constructively, this account will be blocked for disruption. -- Merope 18:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Janice (Friends character)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Janice (Friends character), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Janice (Friends character) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Janice (Friends character), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manuelgate

Try as I might, I cannot understand this move, which was without discussion or consensus. If you'd care to give some explanation, an unblock may be forthcoming, but it has to be said that your previous record of editing here is not that impressive. Comments welcome. Rodhull andemu 01:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have unblocked you; on reflection, it is late here and such a sudden move without consensus by an editor with a WP:REDLINKed use page can easily be mistaken for a particularly insidious type of vandalism that we see here from time to time. However, "Manuelgate" is, as far as I know, not a common term for this incident and should have been discussed before being made. Your editing record didn't help you either, but apologies if I over-reacted; my focus is to protect the encyclopedia. Rodhull andemu

File:Susan-Boyle.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Susan-Boyle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tovojolo (talk) 16:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Diversity (dance troupe)

Why did you submit the article for deletion. The winners of Britain's Got Talent were announced minutes ago, this is an important article. Rhyshuw1 (talk) 21:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And, please do not strike out other editors comments. Best wishes, Graham Colm ^Talk 21:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars AfD

Thanks for your concern, I'll see how things pan out over the next couple of days :) Dale 13:41, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL, WP:AGF, and WP:NPA: Regarding dismissing those you disagree with as "fanboys"

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 16:09, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noteworthy Article?

Hi. My name is Sean Wolfington and you recently decided to delete the article written about me and it was then deleted. Over a year ago i recieved a message that someone wanted to delete the article but other people decided to keep the article after making edits and adding references. Since i am not very familiar with Wikipedia I wanted to find out why the article was not noteworthy. In addition to not being noteworthy some people said it was self-promoting. This is not true. I discovered this wikipedia page when i googled my name for something else. A freind showed me how i could update it and i updated it so there was more accurate information and then i was told i should not do that. Since that time i never updated it again.

Since i don't know alot about Wikipedia i asked a freind and they suggested i provide information to the people on the business page of Wikipedia to get their oppinion of wheter the article is noteworthy and i wanted to give you additional information that was not on the article you deleted to see if that may change whether the article is noteworthy.

Here is a summary of my background so you can evaluate whether it is noteworthy. All of this information is available through major news outlets and some of it was referenced in the article that was deleted, which i thought was the criteria for determining if something was noteworthy... but again i don't know alot about how this site works. Below is my background information, please tell me if any of this is noteworthy. Some of the information was not in the original article and the additional information may effect whether the article is noteworthy.

Here is my background: I am an Entreprenuer and a film maker. I founded and sold 2 technology companies by the age of 34. The first company, HAC Group which operated as Cyber Car and Automark, sold for $200 million (article with info can be viewed at: http://www.nytimes.com/2000/04/18/business/company-news-reynolds-reynolds-to-buy-hac-group-for-200-million.html) and the second for $125 million dollars of enterprise value (BZ Results article- http://www.dealerrefresh.com/adp-buys-bz-results/ - there are many articles about these companies but these are links i just found). My company was recognized as the "Innovative company of the year" from Auto Success Magazine along with SAP (http://www.autosuccessonline.com/leadership.aspx) and I was a finalist for the Ernst & Young "Entreprenuer of the Year" when i was 34 years old and a few months ago was recognized by Haute Living Magazine as one of the top 100 most influential leaders in the Haute 100 (view at:http://www.hauteliving.com/?s=sean+wolfington). After selling the second company, I started a film production company where i financed, produced and distributed the first film myself (Bella)and it was the #1 top grossing film in its category. (here is an article i wrote for the Huffington Post about it- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-wolfington/what-i-learned-about-maki_b_102704.html and LA Times wrote an article about it - articles.latimes.com/2007/dec/04/entertainment/et-bella4) It also was the #1 rated movie on Yahoo, NY Times, Fandango and Rotten Tomatoes while in theaters and it is currently one of the top 50 Rated Films of All Time on Yahoo and it was the #1 Rated movie of 2007 by the users of the largest film review site in the world, RottenTomatoes.com. After that i produced 2 other films including a new motion picture called Mighty Macks (you can view at IMDB http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1034324/ and you can view my film history at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2055676/). In addition to the film production company i currently own 6 companies in the technology, real estate and entertainment industries.

I can provide more information but this is a summary of my background. Please let me know if you believe this is noteworthy enough. Thank you. Seanwolfington (talk) 05:28, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD deletion

Did not realize that the statement had ever been posted. I received a notification about a conflicting edit after I had saved the changes, and did not see my statement in there. My apologies. Vulture19 (talk) 16:23, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Sockpuppet?

Oh, seems like someone was trying to build a case against you by making personal attacks. I wouldn't worry if I were you :) GaGaOohLaLa (talk) 19:10, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bravedog for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

I have blocked this account without an expiry for engaging in sockpuppetry(see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Bravedog#Conclusions). I have also blocked your sock puppet accounts User:GaGaOohLaLa and User:Dalejenkins. While I have made the duration of the block indefinite I am not opposed to another admin changing to a fixed duration. You may request a review of this block, or its duration with the {{unblock}} template. ^Chillum 02:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]