User talk:BollyBœuf

Your question at the Help desk

	Hello BollyBœuf. Replies have been posted to your question at the Help desk. If the problem is solved, please place {{Resolved\|1=~~~~}} at the top of the section. Thank you!
	Message added on 19:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{helpdeskreply}} template.

Please provide a source

You should provide a source to confirm what you are saying. I am not sure whether community will agree to include that user to the list. - Supdiop (T🔹C) 20:47, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added sauce. --BollyBœuf (talk) 20:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why we should not treat you as a mischief maker, and perhaps even another incarnation of Technoquat. This statement does not exactly bode well. You will have to provide reliable evidence that Technoquat has died. - Sitush (talk) 21:04, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have evidence here. But the obituary is not in english. --BollyBœuf (talk) 21:06, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But you forget that I edit India-related articles. What page? And why would a collection of rare texts on Tibetan ayurvedic medicine mention the death of the person who went under the pseudonym of Technoquat? This is a hoax, I'm sure of it. - Sitush (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Listen up Shitush, It is actually from Bhutan, a Dzongkha book. It is an obituary book and page 125 documents Technoquats unfortunate incident. It meets Wikipedias guidelines. --BollyBœuf (talk) 21:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked shortly. Your contributions are blatant vandalism and lies. Go find something useful to do with your life, please. - Sitush (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Supdiop (T🔹C) 21:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Supdiop (T🔹C) 21:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nthep (talk) 21:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BollyBœuf (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Jimbo Wales has just contacted me and he said I can be unblocked. BollyBœuf (talk) 21:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I've removed your access to this page to avoid any more time wasting requests. Kuru (talk) 21:25, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.