User talk:Bobjones1984

Welcome!

Hello, Bobjones1984, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Takashi Uesugi, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can place {{helpme}} on your talk page along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! –Ammarpad (talk) 06:43, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ken Joseph Jr

The article Ken Joseph Jr has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ken Joseph Jr

Hello, Bobjones1984. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ken Joseph Jr, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Ken Joseph Jr to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

XyzSpaniel Talk Page 21:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm ImprovedWikiImprovment. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mitsuo Fuchida without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. IWI (chat) 09:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Further to the above, it is very difficult to assume that you are acting in good faith when you use misleading edit summaries like this (and many others apparent in your history). If you persist in doing so, you will be blocked. Please do not hesitate to ask me if you have any questions about this. Steve Smith (talk) 03:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And probably indefinitely. I see multiple edits - some very large, that you claimed were grammar or typos. Do it again and I see you doing it and I'll block you. Doug Weller talk 13:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice for post-1932 American politics and living or recently deceased people

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:30, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (help!) 12:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that indefinitely does not mean forever. It does, however, mean that you need to start engaging with the Wikipedia community to address the concerns noted above, which continue on your edits today. Note to reviewing admins: an unblock with an AP2 topic ban would probably be OK. Guy (help!) 12:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been indefinitely topic banned from all pages and discussions concerning post-1932 American politics. Please read WP:TBAN to see what "topic banned" means.

You have been sanctioned see warnings above which you ignored.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Doug Weller talk 13:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked you but

you need to follow the topic ban carefully - read what it means - and you need to start writing appropriate edit summaries or you will be blocked again. Doug Weller talk 13:08, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. Guy (help!) 22:13, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Doug Weller - repeat of the same edit warring [1], same article, within the TBAN scope, no edit summary, still no engagement with the community at all. I suggest we leave blocked pending engagement. Guy (help!) 22:18, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]