User talk:Bobbyyyy

Speedy deletion of Ross worner

A tag has been placed on Ross worner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Dengero (talk) 12:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ross Worner still does not meet notability at WP:ATHLETE as he has not played in a fully-professional league yet. --Jimbo^[online] 11:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 20:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I admit I was in the wrong with my article concerning James Priestley. I was with my mates and we were just messing around. I promise never to do this again and when mates are next time around we will not do this again. I am new to wikipedia, as my mistake on my Ross Worner shows, i was just getting a feel for how to use wikipedia, but i feel i can contribute to wikipedia as my article about Ross Worner shows. I have a good knowledge of lower league football and will be able to add many more pages like Ross Worner's in the future. I request to be unblocked as I recognise what I did was wrong and will never happen again and also that I can contribute a lot to wikipedia in the future.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Ok, I'll give you another chance. PhilKnight (talk) 21:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: PhilKnight (talk) 21:07, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nikki Bull

A tag has been placed on Nikki Bull requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. --Jimbo^[online] 11:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]