User talk:Bloxwichgroup

February 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. —SMALL JIM 16:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. I have deleted the pages that you created, for this reason. You might find it useful to work through our article wizard. —SMALL JIM 16:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bloxwichgroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

new username (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

So I can cut and paste the information in this user space and put in under my own account (Neil Moir) before continuing to edit the article , thanks NeilBloxwichgroup (talk) 12:04 pm, 26 February 2016, Friday (10 days ago) (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

You have to (a) propose new username that is not already taken, and (b) to respond to questions posted below. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There already appears to be an account by the name User:Neil Moir, which was registered in August 2015. If that's yours, then just use it and forget this one - you don't need this one unblocked. If it's not yours and you want this account renamed, you'll need to specify a different username (please insert it where it says "new username" in the request above). Regarding the content you had at User:Bloxwichgroup/sandbox/Bloxwich Truck & Container Ltd and Draft:Bloxwich Group (Bloxwich Transport & Container Products Ltd), they have both been deleted as promotional material so you would not be able to copy and paste them whichever account you use - you would need to ask the deleting admin (User:Smalljim) if they would undelete and "userfy" copies under whichever username you eventually use (or maybe email the contents to you). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have determined that some, perhaps all, of the content you posted violated Wikipedia's copyright policy, so it would not be suitable for userfication, as Boing! said Zebedee suggested. Also, I am concerned by the fact that your unblock request appears to indicate that you intend to continue editing in the same way as you did before being blocked: no matter what username you edit under, editing to promote, advertise, or publicise your business is contrary to Wikipedia policy. Although Smalljim chose to give you a block notice which put most emphasis on the username issue, I draw your attention to the fact that the block notice also said "You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose". The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]