User talk:BloodyKnuckles1

Welcome!

Hello, BloodyKnuckles1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Neck (children's game), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Justeditingtoday (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Neck (children's game)

The article Neck (children's game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just a repeat of an Urban Dictionary page. Non-notable game made up one day.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justeditingtoday (talk) 02:30, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neck (children's game) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neck (children's game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neck (children's game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justeditingtoday (talk) 02:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neck (children's game)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Neck (children's game) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 15:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cool S for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cool S is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool S until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing personal! Although I am far from sure that the shatter S is notable (I'll ask some of my son's skaterat mates) the article itself is very creditable. I hope this doesn't put you off editing Wikipedia.TheLongTone (talk) 16:19, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closed this as keep today. The article has been much improved by new sources found during the AfD discussion. I found your arguments during the debate very persuasive :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:50, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (1797 Rugby School Rebellion) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1797 Rugby School Rebellion, BloodyKnuckles1!

Wikipedia editor Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article. Unbelievable it dind't already exist tbh. Cheers!

To reply, leave a comment on Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 12:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, I'm Mutt Lunker. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mary, Queen of Scots have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mutt Lunker (talk) 07:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. Your recent edit to Feminism appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Note: All content added or edited need to support by independent reliable source for verification. For reliable source pls see - WP:RS, and for verification please see - WP:V. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:14, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --ChiveFungi (talk) 12:27, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:33, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:S Chain, In Blue Pen, June 2017.jpg

The file File:S Chain, In Blue Pen, June 2017.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused file with no foreseeable educational purpose, out of scope

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much!]} 11:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Cool S.jpg

The file File:The Cool S.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused file with no foreseeable educational purpose, out of scope

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much!]} 11:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:How to draw Cool S.jpg

The file File:How to draw Cool S.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused file with no foreseeable educational purpose, out of scope

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MATRIX! (a good person!)^{[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much!]} 11:21, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Super S Stussy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Super S Stussy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 17 § Super S Stussy until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 21:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]