Jump to content

User talk:Blethering Scot/2017/1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Precious anniversary

Three years ago ...
heart of Midlothian
... you were recipient
no. 717 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.[1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.[2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.


Take the survey now!


You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Charlie and the Chocolate Factory the Musical (Cast Cd).jpg.png

Thank you for uploading File:Charlie and the Chocolate Factory the Musical (Cast Cd).jpg.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:12, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Wicked (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wicked (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Wicked (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

2017–18 Heart of Midlothian F.C. season

 Done GiantSnowman 20:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Scottish contracts

Not a clue I'm afraid! GiantSnowman 19:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Season overview

I did not find that discussion, will look for it tomorrow. We did agree at some point to remove it... pretty sure. Kante4 (talk) 20:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

I have no opinion on the matter either way. My personal opinion is its overkill, but they are sourceable so the argument in that discussion didnt back It up.Blethering Scot 20:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
So, you kind of agree about the removal? I could have cited WP:NOTSTATS or WP:LISTCRUFT aswell. Kante4 (talk) 04:00, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Here you go. Removed them... Kante4 (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
No bother.Blethering Scot 20:52, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Hmmm... Removing takes too much time i guess. Tag then. Kante4 (talk) 18:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
The result summary can stay as far as i know. Kante4 (talk) 18:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
It's different than results overview. ;) Kante4 (talk) 10:06, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Are we talking about results by round? If not then all the other tables are exactly the same, unsourced and duplication of content already in article. Definite failure of policy in my opinion. Blethering Scot 10:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, results by round and the one with home and away. Those were, i never saw it, never in doubt. Home/Away overview is nice to have. Kante4 (talk) 10:47, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Results by round I think is valid as not covered by any other template hence I've made no attempt to remove. Home and Away I am yet to find one that is properly & directlly sourced rather than using many sources defining original research. Its replication of data available In article as well.Blethering Scot 20:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
There is a discussion going on, just so you know. Kante4 (talk) 12:49, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Discussion says otherwise at Footy. Simple as that. Kante4 (talk) 08:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Simple as that does not meet core verifiability or rules against original research. WP:Footy cannot circumvent core policies Kante.Blethering Scot 18:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from using inappropriate language in your summary

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ral 33 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Seasons

Are we going to get over this spit, feels like a flame war from a forum, take your points on board but you need to stop being so pedantic about it, instead of removing why not tag them instead, that would be much more productive! Anyway the offer stands to squash this childishness, we both edit wiki for fun as a hobby, this crap just make its a pride thing instead lol!

"League results summary: source does not verify all elements and what it does verify is included in article already as a league table" like this is more productive, I am fine with that! Much better, now let me help out on other articles together, I already prepared some historical hearts kits etc for you to add, I am working on the other kits also for other clubs!
Oh and I was not being fake with what I said, it is a subject quite close to me, really if you don't want to squash it then all the best Kyndigs (talk) 12:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Apologies

Hi BletheringScot. Apologies for posting on the article talk page then posting here. I saw you were active, but didn't know if you would read the article talk page, so posted here instead. Is it possible to talk about your latest edits on the article talk page? Celticbhoy97 (talk) 18:59, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Athletic Bilbao seasons

Hi, I would like to have some words about your recent changes in 2015–16 and 2016–17 season articles.
Firstly, I hope you can consider restoring their 'Overall' and 'Overview' sections. 'Overall' is just a summary of obvious and easily verifiable information, it cannot be considered a WP:OR, and it helps readers to comprehend club's performance in that season as a whole. 'Overview' is no more than a simple WP:CALC based on verified and obvious information as well, those statistics are also easy to read, I think it is not a WP:NOTSTATS case because they do not reduce article's readability.
Secondly, about 'Player statistics' sections, I admit that some of their information may be considered WP:OR, but others have good sources (sorry for not providing them sooner). LaLiga and UEFA competitions have such statistics (minutes played, assists, etc.) for all players, so I would like to remove WP:OR and WP:SOURCE templates after supplementing those sections. Centaur271188 (talk) 10:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

There is a discussion about it here. Kante4 (talk) 10:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
@Kante4: Thanks for that notice. I talk directly to Blethering Scot because I think this issue is about me and him only. Centaur271188 (talk) 10:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
I brought it to the project because he removed that from many articles and the community disagrees with that. Kante4 (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
The project can disagree all it likes, but unless they are sourced then core policies override them every time. Blethering Scot 11:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
The issue with the asssists, which the project don't disagree on is that they are rarely considered the same across all competitions and mostly but not in this case unsourced. The project therefore decided assists should not be included. Unlike verification this is within there realm of acceptability. Blethering Scot 12:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
If you remove the assists from the table, then you can remove all templates. The only option really is to tag, because removing assist from every page would be a nightmare. Also yeah the sourcing is much better than it was. Blethering Scot 12:04, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
I just dont think you are correct with your policies. Need to check it tomorrow... So, you remove it from every article (3000 ones)? I dont think that needs a source as said above as it is just an overview. Kante4 (talk) 12:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

OK, I will remove assists information from those tables. About 'Overall' and 'Overview' sections, I will wait a little bit more. Centaur271188 (talk) 15:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:From Here to Eternity (Cast Cd).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:From Here to Eternity (Cast Cd).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Blethering Scot. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

[[User:Blethering Scot|<font color="maroon">Blethering</font>]] [[User talk:Blethering Scot|<font color="green">Scot</font>]]  : Blethering Scot


to

[[User:Blethering Scot|<span style="color: maroon">Blethering</span>]] [[User talk:Blethering Scot|<span style="color: green;">Scot</span>]]  : Blethering Scot

—Anomalocaris (talk) 07:46, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Blethering Scot 20:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 09:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blethering_Scot/2017/1&oldid=1144096486"