User talk:Blakestheory

Welcome!

Hello, Blakestheory, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Blakestheory, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Blue Riband► 23:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Blakestheory

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Blakestheory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Blue Riband► 23:47, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial topic area alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Falun Gong. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 06:58, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:The Epoch Times. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:08, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain more on your claim "I did not do on". Blakestheory (talk) 13:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Clearly the original author has an bias and political agenda, otherwise such extreme "far" statements would not be necessary in good/fair/unbiased Wiki authoring" Doug Weller talk 14:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And of course there's this:"Tired that the real truth, not supporting a liberal narrative, being characterized as a result of extremist hypocritical people." Carry on like this and you will likely get a WP:NOTHERE block. Doug Weller talk 14:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. The fight for "the truth" is very real.

Are you saying the liberal wikipedia authoring should have the monopoly on the truth? Blakestheory (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. I'm not the one talking about "real truth". Doug Weller talk 16:11, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm puzzled by your response.

If you are a moderator, and your investment in time to Wikipedia to keep Wikipedia accurate (your time investment relevant), then I would think that would be of keen interest to you. Blakestheory (talk) 17:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does it help wikipedia that authors use "superlative statements" some how?

Superlative statements like "far right" are the result of underlying devisieness.

This article would have been fine to just state "right", so then what was the need to state "far right"?

Hopefully you can agee the world does not need more devisieness. Blakestheory (talk) 15:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]