User talk:BlackBeeEnthusiast

December 2023

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to European dark bee, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 01:09, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing sourced content on European dark bee. If you believe your removals are correct, don't re-implement them, but instead explain why on the article's talk page. Thank you. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok apologies. I thought this was how it was done. I've not edited a page before. The information there was just so biased and incorrect and anybody reading it may assume the information is correct because good literature was cited; however the content of said literature was often misinterpreted or only partially presented offering a skewed content. BlackBeeEnthusiast (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then take it to the Talk Page and we all can have a discussion about it over the next couple of months, and get a consensus, however I suspect much of this has been hashed out on other beekeeping wiki pages, so we'll be going over old ground. If you can cite new (more up to date) Sources, then we would be Very very interested, information can certainly change over time with new findings, research, etc. The recent DNA findings are one such example, causing a researcher/author of a 2020 paper to point out that the A. m. mellifera in Ireland could be used to repopulate the Netherlands with A. m. mellifera as DNA analysis had discovered that they were in fact Dutch having been imported in the previous century! Bibby (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]