Jump to content

User talk:Biologyfishman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Biologyfishman! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Biologyfishman. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Hugsyrup 10:38, 23 August 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Biologyfishman. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 23 August 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 14:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Conflcit of interest editing

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Biologyfishman. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Andrew Evans (travel writer), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Biologyfishman. I've added the above template after reading some of your comments at the Wikipedia Teahouse and the Articles for creation/Help desk. I've just added it for reference purposes, not because you you've done anything wrong. The template contains (blue) links to various Wikipedia pages that you might find helpful, but you might also want to look at Wikipedia:Ownership of content, Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, Wikipedia:An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Law of unintended consequences and Wikipedia:Notability (people). Please note that even though Wikipedia doesn't expressly prohibit COI editing, it is something which is highly discouraged. Editors do tend to be given a bit a leeway when it comes to any conflict-of-interest they may have while they are working on a draft because it's assumed that most major problems are going to be addressed during the Articles for Creation review process; however, things completely change once a draft, etc. enters the article namespace and such editors will then be expected to do their utmost to adhere to relevant COI guidelines as well as other relevant Wikipedia policies. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Biologyfishman! You created a thread called Need constructive critique, not copy paste dismissal at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Andrew Evans (travel writer), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Evans (travel writer) has been accepted

[edit]
Andrew Evans (travel writer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Sulfurboy (talk) 06:17, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]