User talk:Bijoyonline30

Untitled

(unrelated but kept for historical reference purposes) With due respect...Sir please create Yash dasgupta's Mon Jaane Na & Sos Kolkata Film Article as soon as possible...Mon Jaane Na released in (2019).

Mon Jaane Na

Sir, Please Create Mon Jaane Na (2019) Film Article.As Soon As Possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.25.249.249 (talk) 13:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey , Thanks For your suggestion. Bijoyonline30 (talk) 16:07, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bijoyonline30, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bijoyonline30! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello teahouse hosts, I have a question. How I can do better edit then previous. Can anyone please guide me, so that I could contribute more, and to be a better wikipedian. Thanks Bijoyonline30 (talk) 08:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Bijoyonline30. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Anshu Bach moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anshu Bach, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon 11:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review. Bijoyonline30 (talk) 08:59, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abhirup Ghosh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abhirup Ghosh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://in.bookmyshow.com/amp/person/abhirup-ghosh/1082972. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 13:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey , thanks for your review. If I remove those thing then will the speedy deletion removed ?? Bijoyonline30 (talk) 09:12, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly formatted reference titles

Hi there, how is it possible that the bulk of the references you add have incorrect capitalisation? I'm looking at these, for instance:

"filmmaker Anshuman Pratyush..." vs. "Filmmaker Anshuman Pratyush..."
"coronavirus scare Jeet Mimi cut short Baazi shoot..." vs "Coronavirus scare: Jeet, Mimi cut short ‘Baazi’ shoot..."
"backtowork Yash Nusrat Mimi set to shoot..." vs. "#BackToWork: Yash-Nusrat-Mimi set to shoot..."

And I see the same thing here, like:

"now a film on internet sensation ranu mondal" vs. "Now, A Film On Internet Sensation Ranu Mondal".

How is this happening, and can you please fix these and start using proper English title formatting from now on? Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thank you for rectifying my mistakes. Will do it correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bijoyonline30 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SOS Kolkata moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SOS Kolkata, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 00:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bijoyonline30! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need your help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bijoyonline30! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help about protected article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sayak Chakraborty (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NACTOR, requires significant roles (not minor appearances) in multiple notable films or television series.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sayak Chakraborty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sayak Chakraborty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:49, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dan arndt thank you for reviewing my draft. I have added 2 more article which I got from google and I have resubmitted again. Please do review again. And help me to learn more. Thanks sir

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bijoyonline30! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help About Protected Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bijoyonline30! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help About Reliable Sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bijoyonline30! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Eligibility of an Article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SOS Kolkata (September 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs critical reception and box office.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SOS Kolkata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SOS Kolkata, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Angus W🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pathikrit Basu (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pathikrit Basu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pathikrit Basu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:04, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 17:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SuperMarioMan {{unblock|I had created a few articles and then I asked to an admin to create an article by one named Swastika Dutta. And as a result you blocked me, and you give reason that I'm a sockpuppet of RakhiDas and sayanonline15. But I don't know those users. I just sent a request to create an article called Swastika Dutta as I do Bengali entertainment actor and actress and directors article that's why I asked permission for creating Swastika Dutta, sir I am not a sockpuppeter. I don't know any of those user}}. So I'm requesting to admins Please look into this matter. And I m requesting to unblock me. Hopefully I will get reply. Thanks

User cheaker

Hello SuperMarioMan {{unblock|I had created a few articles and then I asked to an admin to create an article by one named Swastika Dutta. And as a result you blocked me, and you give reason that I'm a sockpuppet of RakhiDas and sayanonline15. But I don't know those users. I just sent a request to create an article called Swastika Dutta as I do Bengali entertainment actor and actress and directors article that's why I asked permission for creating Swastika Dutta, sir I am not a sockpuppeter. I don't know any of those user}}. So I'm requesting to admins Please look into this matter. And I m requesting to unblock me. Hopefully I will get reply. Thanks

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ranu Mondal (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ranu Mondal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ranu Mondal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī (^talk) 11:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commando: Get Ready For War has been accepted

Commando: Get Ready For War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 22:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]