User talk:Beagel/archive2017

Archives... 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

Ongoing discussion on power station infobox

Hello Beagel,

I saw your signature on Template talk:Infobox power station and since that page has an ongoing discussion of changes to that infobox, I thought you might have something to contribute:

Template_talk:Infobox_power_station#Nuclear_Power_Plants:_Status_value_when_reactors_operational.2C_but_not_generating_power_for_years_.3F

Best regards, Lklundin (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notification. I have that template on my watchlist and I am aware of that discussion. I did not contribute to that discussion yet as I need a little bit more time to go trough the current discussion before making my contribution. Beagel (talk) 14:53, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Gerda! Beagel (talk) 17:47, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I came too soon: it's today ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Puma Energy

Hi Beagel, I've highlighted a few possible updates to Puma Energy (here) if you've got a moment to take a look. Thanks very much. HOgilvy (talk) 16:59, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Beagel, these any good? Thanks. HOgilvy (talk) 11:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HOgilvy. I see that the article was updated by Dormskirk. Wish all the best. Beagel (talk) 17:50, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Energinet logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Energinet logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BP follow-up

Hi Beagel, I found a couple details in BP that can be referenced to the 2016 annual report, rather than the 2015 filing, as you requested. Can you review them at the bottom of our recent discussion here?

I am happy to discuss any questions. Thanks. Arturo at BP (talk) 20:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arturo at BP. I see that the article was updated by DrStrauss. Wish all the best. Beagel (talk) 18:27, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Kosmos Energy

Hi Beagel, I'm looking for help with expanding the article for Kosmos Energy and I thought to reach out to you as you're a long-standing member of WikiProject Energy and have previously made an edit to the Kosmos Energy Wikipedia article when it was still just a stub, as well as editing the Jubilee Oil Field article. As you might be aware, Kosmos discovered the Jubilee Oil Field, and the company has made some other significant discoveries in the last few years, but the Wikipedia article is still very short. To help build out the page, I've been working on a draft and have been proposing chunks of it via the Kosmos Talk page, starting with the infobox and now moving on to an all-new proposed Operations section. Is this something you'd be interested to look at? Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:46, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow forgot to mention: I have a conflict of interest, as I'm working on behalf of Kosmos via PR group Ogilvy as part of my work at Beutler Ink. As such, I won't be editing the article directly and would prefer to get uninvolved editors' feedback and help taking changes live. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Beagel (talk) 18:24, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Beagel! Thanks so much for the review and updating the article. I know you're busy, so I just wanted to drop a quick note here to say how much I appreciate the close review and I'd be grateful if you could take a look at the small edits I've suggested to finish up the page. No rush, just making sure it is on your radar and to let you know if you're not able to peek, definitely let me know and I can be sure to reach out elsewhere if needed. Thanks again! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 20:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick nudge here to see if you'd still be able to take a look at these edits? Thanks in advance. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:15, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uniper has been nominated for discussion

Category:Uniper, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Greenbörg (talk) 09:42, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dept. of Justice listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dept. of Justice. Since you had some involvement with the Dept. of Justice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. f e minist 16:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nord Pool Spot logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nord Pool Spot logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Beagel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Beagel.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 09:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Beagel.

AfC submissions
Random submission

~6 weeks

1,031 pending submissions

Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eesti Merelevandus listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Eesti Merelevandus. Since you had some involvement with the Eesti Merelevandus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.

I hope this is fine by you - I would put it under speedy deletion R3, but it's a pretty darn old page. Ashela (talk) 17:09, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]