User talk:Bavaria49

Welcome!

Hi Bavaria49! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Gene93k. Happy to help! Bavaria49 (talk) 14:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Portugal Brain Drain (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Portugal Brain Drain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bavaria49! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your additions to list articles

Hello. I notice that you have added entries to List of pornography companies and List of pornography companies. With the porn-related lists especially, an entry should have a published Wikipedia article that establishes notability for inclusion. In short, write the article first. That avoids indiscriminate and spam entries. I see the user-space draft you are creating. The subject can be added to the list when the subject is approved for publication, not before. Thank you for your contributions, but please stop adding red-link entries to the porn lists. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense, Thanks for your help. I'm not sure lack of experience in these things should warrant a speedy block by Jimfbleak again! After reviewing his recent activity log, I have noticed a relatively high number of blocks issued compared to other administrators. While I understand that enforcing guidelines is crucial for the integrity of the platform, the frequency of these actions has raised some concerns with me. I suspect Jimfbleak is targeting me specifically even though I tried to add to the commnity about the area I live in Portugal.

I am reaching out to better understand the reasoning behind this pattern, as I am worried that it may suggest an overuse of administrative authority by Jimfbleak. Maintaining fairness and proportionality in decision-making is vital for preserving community trust in this platform.

I would appreciate your insights into this matter and look forward to hearing from you. Bavaria49 (talk) 16:44, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bavaria49/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Bavaria49/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]