User talk:BarrySpinno

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to English land law, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think there was any such notice there! Just transferred some text to a more appropriate page on land law. BarrySpinno (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to English land law, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:36, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was moved to the land law page - rather than deleted. Hope that makes sense. BarrySpinno (talk) 09:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

British Airways plc v Commission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to British Airways plc v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google LLC v Commission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Google LLC v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:37, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Solvents Corporation v Commission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Commercial Solvents Corporation v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:38, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AstraZeneca plc v Commission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to AstraZeneca plc v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:15, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AKZO Chemie BV v Commission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to AKZO Chemie BV v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest, @User:Seawolf35 and @User:CycloneYoris - but the pages are referenced - check out case citation to understand the references for law articles. I've also put in a book for you. Hope that helps for the future. BarrySpinno (talk) 00:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! BarrySpinno, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Maylingoed. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Australian labour law—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 04:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're referring to, but I'm updating the whole page. Do give suggestions if you have any for what you'd like to see. BarrySpinno (talk) 05:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 22:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:44, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Australian labour law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boards. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

British Airways plc v Commission moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to British Airways plc v Commission. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 16:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 16:24, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @BarrySpinno: Please, Just ignore this. I thought because the article was single reference, it wasn't viable, and took the thing to the wrong. Just ignore. I must have half sleeping. scope_creep^Talk 20:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BarrySpinno. Thank you for your work on AstraZeneca plc v Commission. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs more secondary sources and explanatory material derived from them. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, BarrySpinno. Thank you for your work on Google LLC v Commission. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. Needs secondary sources and material derived from them. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uk public

Hello BarrySpinno,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Uk public for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Uk public to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Remsense诉 05:30, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Uk public" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Uk public has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 12 § Uk public until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mercedes and Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Oz lab" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Oz lab has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Oz lab until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Oz labour" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Oz labour has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Oz labour until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Merger Regulation 2004" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Merger Regulation 2004 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 17 § Merger Regulation 2004 until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page S curve.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Commercial Solvents Corporation v Commission

Hello, BarrySpinno,

Thank you for creating Commercial Solvents Corporation v Commission.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

It would be helpful to add secondary sources to your articles to establish notability. I have added some general references here because the subject appears notable, but adding these as footnotes at creation would be better.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Triptothecottage}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Triptothecottage (talk) 10:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons to Be Cheerful (podcast) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Reasons to Be Cheerful (podcast). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:British Airways plc v Commission

Hello, BarrySpinno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British Airways plc v Commission, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Reasons to Be Cheerful (podcast)

Hello, BarrySpinno. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Reasons to Be Cheerful (podcast), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent Working Directive 2019 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Transparent Working Directive 2019. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Reasons to Be Cheerful (podcast)

Hello, BarrySpinno. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Reasons to Be Cheerful".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:27, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]