User talk:Barabbas1312

Military commissariat

Hello, I am currently editing the page 'military commissariat' and noticed that the information you provided did not have any citations, I was wondering if you remembered where you got your information from and if there is more to add? I am interested in your comparison to the Quartermasters in the US. You will see the information under the 'other european countries' heading. Thank you! Jijiathome (talk) 00:06, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jijiathome:Thank-you - I had previously added historical information relating to Britain to the Commissariat page; then, subsequently, I discovered the 'Military Commissariat' page, but only added a couple of brief details. Sorry for lack of reference; I got a fair bit of information from here, page 53 ff: [1].Barabbas1312 (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Barabbas1312: thank you so much, wow! Jijiathome (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heugh lighthouse

Just thought I would drop in and say thanks for the nice article on the Heugh lighthouse. I noticed it mentioned that it was the first gas lit lighthouse, which piqued my interest as I have created an article on the Savudrija Lighthouse, which was first lit by coal gas in 1818 (I have yet to add that to the article though). Looking elsewhere I noticed that Rowlett mentions in the Upstate New York listing that the Barcelona Light used natural gas from 1831. So maybe worth saying that it was the first British lighthouse that used natural gas. (I will watch here if you reply)- Happy Editing...Jokulhlaup (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks - looking again at sources, I see it is more precisely referred to as the 'first lighthouse to be reliably [or sustainably] lit by gas - a claim which might still stand, as several earlier gas-powered lighthouses had problems. Apologies for omitting this crucial word I'll amend the entry to correct the wording, and to make clear that this is may be open to dispute.

Thanks for having another look, your correction seems fine to me, and nicely done...Jokulhlaup (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grade I listed buildings in the City of London

Thank you for taking photos to fill the remaining gaps in Grade I listed buildings in the City of London! Ham II (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Navy Board, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ordinances. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Victualling Commissioners

		The Original Barnstar
		I had been reasonably certain the article on Victualling Commissioners would be a five-line stub, so was impressed to discover a detailed and informative piece. Thanks for your major expansion of this obscure topic. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Trooping the Colour- Barouche Carriage.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trooping the Colour- Barouche Carriage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:17, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Trooping the Colour- Phaeton 1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trooping the Colour- Phaeton 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wardrobe (government), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Status quo ante. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Military Academy, Woolwich

Hi - Many thanks for your edits to the article on the the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich. I have added a few references to the article but I am not sure where you got the South Sea Bubble connection from - although the timing is about right. Are you able to add a source? Thanks Dormskirk (talk) 20:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - same source, different chapter! Added; and continuing to edit...--Barabbas1312 (talk) 21:15, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Many thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 21:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lights of North Shields has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Barabbas1312. Lights of North Shields, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 10 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Royal Artillery Barracks page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Arsenal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Gunpowder Mills. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the HMNB Devonport page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chattenden

Hi - Many thanks for your excellent work on Chattenden. I have now established a separate article at Chattenden and Lodge Hill Military Camps. Please feel free to expand it further. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 10:24, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have undone your cut-and-paste move

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Defence College of Management and Technology a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Royal Military College of Science. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have requested deletion of the redirect etc at Royal Military College of Science so that the move you originally intended can be completed properly. I hope this helps. Dormskirk (talk) 23:05, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for High and Low Lights of North Shields

On 24 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article High and Low Lights of North Shields, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Black Middens were avoided by aligning the Lights of North Shields (pictured)? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, High and Low Lights of North Shields), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge

Beautiful work Barabbas! Can I tempt you to join this challenge? We'll have a contest for the Northeast soon! So far we have nearly 1900 articles. We'd love for you to be a part of it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:31, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Barabbas1312. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Coronation of the British monarch

Greetings, I would just like to know what you mean in your recent additions to the lead: "however, it has also always been distinct from these in presenting a constitutional (rather than absolutist) model of monarchy, with its unique requirement that the monarch first swear an oath..." Don't other coronations also feature an oath-taking? Regards. --OrbisR (talk) 12:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@OrbisR: Thanks; I will try to redraft to make it clearer (and will remove the unhelpful 'unique'). Roy Strong's book (much quoted in the article) emphasizes the promissio regis (coronation oath) as a distinctive element of the English coronation service from Saxon times onwards: "The placing of [it] at the opening of the Coronation service remained through the centuries one of the defining documents as to the nature of the monarchy [...] in England, [which] never became, as it did in France, absolute. It always remained conditional upon being faithful to the three pledges given in the oath to maintain peace, administer justice and maintain equity and mercy". --Barabbas1312 (talk) 20:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HM Victualling Yard, Deptford has been accepted

HM Victualling Yard, Deptford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Barabbas1312. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HM Customs and Excise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hythe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HM Customs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hythe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Barabbas1312/Speaker's State Coach

Hello, Barabbas1312. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Speaker's State Coach".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Barabbas1312. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Military College of Science

Hi - Do think you could add any missing references to your helpful edits to this article? I think I have found most of them. Thanks, Dormskirk (talk) 23:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Lundy Suggestion

Thanks for your extensive contributions to lighthouse details across Wikipedia. It is fine to leave a tag on a non-contentious statement which requires clarification. It can also help other editors. In the mean time the source on the Lundy page doesn't mention Dungeness. Thanks. Mramoeba (talk) 19:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mramoeba: Thanks - evidently forgot which Trinity House page I was reading at the time! Have aimed to fix but have left the tag in place.Barabbas1312 (talk) 19:56, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Marine Depot, Deal

Hi - Please can you add some citations to your very helpful recent edits. I have assumed that History of the Royal Marines in Deal / Walmer is your main source but please amend if you have got better sources. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 09:25, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dormskirk: Thanks - will try to keep improving, but may be delayed till after the weekend.Barabbas1312 (talk) 16:43, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 16:48, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Well done on the brilliant new pictures you have added to this article! Dormskirk (talk) 19:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dormskirk: Thanks for this, and likewise for multiple other assorted recent 'thank-you's - much appreciated!Barabbas1312 (talk) 19:35, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help in Sunderland

Hi, how are you? Sorry to bother you about it.

There is a graffiti in Sunderland with Raich Carter, here's a link: [2].

I don't know how to do it, so could I please ask you to upload that photo to Wiki? I would like to add it to theCity of Sunderland, Hendon, Sunderland, Raich Carter and Sunderland AFC articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxim.il89 (talk • contribs) 14:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MOD Feltham and Feltham House

Hi - Many thanks for your excellent work on MOD Feltham and Feltham House. Are you OK if I transfer it to a separate article (probably as Feltham Barracks) to allow expansion? Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dormskirk: Splendid, yes - thanks.Barabbas1312 (talk) 20:27, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 21:41, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JFC -> Strategic Command

Thank you for catching this. I was aware of it as I made the UKSC -> SC (UK) page move, but did not actually do it!! Cheers and Merry Christmas Buckshot06 (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Scarborough lighthouse

Hi; do you have a page for the Scarborough Lighthouse as the current link on the Scarborough Town is a redlink? Thanks and regards. The joy of all things (talk) 09:15, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@The joy of all things: Belatedly (!) yes: Scarborough Pier Lighthouse Barabbas1312 (talk) 09:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ta! Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 09:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Lighthouse Barnstar
	Nice new article at Scarborough Pier Lighthouse. I noticed that there is no Lighthouse Barnstar, so I created this one, just for you! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}_{(click me!)} 21:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Insertcleverphrasehere: Too kind! - thanks very much for your encouragement, much appreciated. Barabbas1312 (talk) 09:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burnham-on-Sea Round Tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cynosure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:George III Windsor Uniform.jpg

The file File:George III Windsor Uniform.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MasterOfTheHorseUn.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:MasterOfTheHorseUn.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 17:28, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pembroke Dock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Call in.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bells

Hi - Many thanks for your excellent additions to the town hall articles in relation to bells and their makers! Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 22:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you likewise for your extremely thorough and very welcome addition of so many pages on Town Halls and the like - much appreciated. Barabbas1312 (talk) 22:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have now written a little article on Hoddesdon Town Hall and transferred you excellent research on the bells at Hoddesdon to that article. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deptford Docks Error

I believe there is in error in the Deptford Dockyard article, under the Victorian rebuilding subhead. The 4th sentence states that one of Joseph Huddart's rope making machines was installed in 1838. The source for that quote is referring to the Deptford docks in Sunderland on the Wear, not the Deptford on the Thames. 208.81.36.179 (talk) 23:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks - Deptford in Sunderland was I believe the site of the first ever factory for machine-made rope (Fothergil's, dating from the 1790s); but it seems Huddard's machinery was indeed installed in Deptford Royal Dockyard (on the Thames) as well - see A treatise on Ropemaking by R Chapman ("formerly Foreman to Messrs. Huddart & Co., Limehouse; and Master Ropemaker of H.M. Dockyard, Deptford"), and Huddart's article in A Biographical Dictionary of Civil Engineers, which describes the Admiralty purchasing his original patent ropemaking machine and installing it in Deptford Dockyard. There must be something about patent ropemaking and places called Deptford! Barabbas1312 (talk) 00:56, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Portland articles

Hi Barabbas1312, I hope you don't mind me approaching you regarding this.

Of course, I don't mind the content from my website (portlandhistory.co.uk) being used as a source of information, but I am wondering how much is intended to be used considering additions from it are being made each day at the moment. I feel certain parts of the Portland Harbour page are beginning to rely on my work a little too much (even the referenced Fiona Taylor book - which contains information on Portland Harbour actually stolen ad verbatim from my website at the time; something the publisher was subsequently made aware of and is rectifying in future editions).

I do a lot of work on Wikipedia too, but I've largely left alone the many Portland-related articles that I started for quite a few years now, in favour of doing my Portland website. I've always been quite happy keeping my website and Wikipedia separate really, and I did not think it met Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources considering it is completely self-published. It has also not been publicly accessible for a few days, yet material has still been cited from it since then. Ajsmith141 (talk) 16:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ever so much. I first contributed to the Portland Harbour page some ten years ago - I tend to edit articles when I look up information out of interest or curiosity and find gaps, inconsistencies (or in some cases errors). Your very helpful website answered some of my questions (especially around the tangled history of Osprey, HMUDE etc.), which is why I duly cited it - legitimately and fairly, I believed. I'm happy not to use your website in future and will remove some of the current references, albeit reserving the right to continue to edit pages using alternative sources. Barabbas1312 (talk) 12:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply and your understanding. That's no problem. I have no issue with my website being used sparingly - I was just becoming a little concerned as the majority of recent additions were being sourced from it. I imagine there are other sources available in book form etc which are more appropriate under Wikipedia's guidelines. The contributions you make to Wikipedia are very useful though and I'm not suggesting otherwise! Thanks also for the latest edit to the Portland Harbour page. Ajsmith141 (talk) 15:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - and I've only just realised that the multiple 'dead linked' citations relating to an 'Encyclopedia of Portland History' also related to your website (or a previous incarnation of it?) - which makes your concern all the more understandable. Barabbas1312 (talk) 16:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, that's correct. The name was only changed to 'Portland History Website' at the beginning of this year as people often seemed to refer to it as that anyway (in line with its url). Ajsmith141 (talk) 16:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

INM, Royal Navy Medical School

Hi there you can call me Pop. I do something a little silly. but i hope you can answer. So me and my friends are autistic and have a very niché interest in RNMS during ww2. we build stuff like their basses (we built a pretty good Greenwich) I was amazed by your recent information about the INM/RNMS school. We was thinking of building the Clevedon House/Backyard where the school would have taken place and i would love extra information regarding that place or even images. Thank you so much and i hope you have a good day. 86.7.77.119 (talk) 03:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've no specialist knowledge I'm afraid; but there were some pictures of the Clevedon factory at www.google.com/books/edition/Clevedon/utTxcxgTr2oC Barabbas1312 (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]