Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Lights of North Shields

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  MPJ-DK  20:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Lights of North Shields

[edit]
The New High and Low Lights, as seen from the river
The New High and Low Lights, as seen from the river
  • Reviewed: Alice Franklin
  • Comment: I started this as a stub two years ago and am pleased to see it developing so well.

5x expanded by Barabbas1312 (talk) and Chesipiero (talk). Nominated by Andrew Davidson (talk) at 11:46, 10 August 2016 (UTC).

  • The article contains some unsourced paragraphs and statements. Gatoclass (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Gatoclass (talk) 10:50, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

I've been leaving the article updates to User:Barabbas1312 but I have just rewritten the sentence identified by User:Gatoclass to clear that particular issue. I have made a further check with Earwig's Copyvio Detector which reports "Violation Unlikely", just finding phrases like "the mouth of the Tyne", which seem quite standard in this context. Andrew D. (talk) 12:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Many thanks; I have also now redrafted and expanded that section.Barabbas1312 (talk) 09:11, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
@Gatoclass: Has the issue you raised been dealt with to your satisfaction? :) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:59, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
@Gatoclass: Try again. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Haven't had time to look at it again yet - I'll get back to it a bit later this week. Gatoclass (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Actually, since I only had the one minor concern, and that's been addressed, I think I will pass it now. Gatoclass (talk) 19:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)