User talk:BandBlue2020

BRING BACK Love (Live) on the inside. My work NEVER stays. You delete too much of it Damn you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs) 2018-07-15T21:26:42 (UTC)

April 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Patti Scialfa has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Patti Scialfa was changed by BandBlue2020 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869975 on 2018-04-12T19:44:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:44, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BandBlue2020, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BandBlue2020! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Wiggles discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Add US titles to the first column, release dates to second, but first you have to source this AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't need sourcing. Sourcing only if I'm adding to the page of an individual album. All info is correct. Put IT back on the page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs)

Please ensure that you are including reliable sources when adding or changing information in articles. You may be sure that "all the info is correct", but readers must be able to verify the content you are adding and this is achieved through the inclusion of reliable sources.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:56, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a final warning. If you continue to add or change content without including a reliable source for your edits, you will be blocked from editing.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Is Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockbuster Pavilion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lost Highway Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daughtry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 in American music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Look Now (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:22, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bring back Farewell Yellow Brick Road tour page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs) 2018-09-04T00:02:12 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you went right back to adding unsourced content when your block expired you have been reblocked for 1 month. If you don't take this time to familiarize yourself with the requirement for reliable sources, your next block will likely be indefinite.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:03, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Some of it has been just corrections. Everything is true. LET ME EDIT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BandBlue2020 (talk • contribs) 2018-09-07T03:20:46 (UTC)

October 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Anthony Field, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You've been blocked before; please stop or you'll probably be blocked again. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:12, 24 October 2018 (UTC) I did NOT vandalize. I corrected.[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BandBlue2020. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Matthew hk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dick in a Box, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 14:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content. Timed blocks appear not to have impressed upon you the requirement to include reliable sources when adding or changing article data, therefore you are blocked indefinitely. Specifically, you are blocked until you are able to successfully appeal the block by demonstrating to reviewing admins that you understand and will abide by our policies regarding verifiability and sourcing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:04, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BandBlue2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is not vandalism. You are treating me unfairly BandBlue2020 (talk) 22:50, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. stwalkerster (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My contributions are useful and I am not causing damage or disruption.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BandBlue2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unnecessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. BandBlue2020 (talk) 03:07, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry via Blue2020 (talk · contribs). I suggest you consider the standard offer, which requires you to go without sock puppetry or block evasion for 6 months. That would be March 2020. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:04, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have been providing useful content. I have not damaged or disrupted Wikipedia. I have not sockpuppeted. I have created new accounts because I have had MANY get shut down and therefore still want to be editing

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BandBlue2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia as nothing that I have done is damage or disruption. BandBlue2020 (talk) 01:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

— JJMC89 (T·C) 03:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

BandBlue2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27127 was submitted on Oct 14, 2019 03:51:30. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BandBlue2020. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 18:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]