User talk:Balablitz/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Balablitz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

One more review

Please review this page Tourism in Visakhapatnam. Thank you--Vin09 (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC),

Kothavalasa-Kirandul line

Good work in improving the Kothavalasa-Kirandul line. Keep it up. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 08:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much! dear @Chandan Guha, cheers like these boost me more. Thanks again. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 15:13, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Panvel railway station

I had noticed that you moved Panvel railway station to Panvel Junction railway station. This move is incorrect as neither the Indian Railways website nor the station/platform boards show Panvel Junction.

You may want to reconsider your move.

Superfast1111 (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

@Superfast1111: Moved back to original. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 16:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Kochadaiyaan

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you.
Marchoctober (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Need info

Pls tell me how to request assessment of a page like for Andhra Pradesh which was performed long back in 2012.--Vin09 (talk) 16:20, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear @Vin09, actually any editor can do the assessment subject to the guidelines set. But please take a look at this for a general overview: WP:ASSESS. For FAQ's on that see: WP:ASSESSMENT. Check these and run the stuffs mentioned here and if needed so request for copy edit. Before nominating an article for good article go through and accomplish the criteria set in. Next step, ask for a peer review, address concerns if any and finally nominate for good article. Going through these process might take sometime, but you it will be a very constructive affair as you will be involved with a good number of experienced editors. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 17:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Howrah Railway Station

Hi balablitz thanks for your suggesion but i know Howrah Station better than you so please try to understand and don't destroy my edits as it takes time to do one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaane Khan (talk • contribs) 05:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear @Shaane Khan, thanks for u say. Its not the matter of how much u know or how much i know to add information in Wikipedia. Its about adding a content with a verifiable source to not only satisfy a reader but also to justify and verify a fact. Honestly, my edits are in good faith and subject to relevant guidelines and not to detroy anything. WP:TRAINS, WP:STATIONS, WP:STATION, WP:INRI and WP:NOTTIMETABLE: please go through these to know more. If u have a any more questions or issues, u could ask at concerned talk page or at India Notice board or help desk or to any admin. Else u can consider a high class (WP:FA or WP:GA) article as a model before editing on something. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 12:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

you as a a reviewer

We are all proud of you as a Wikipedia reviewer but you should always examine the edits like a true reviewer but you dont that's why i am REQUESTING you to examine edits please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaane Khan (talk • contribs) 06:25, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear @Shaane Khan, thanks again. I do always examine the edits as per concerned guidelines and some common sense before clicking the save button. Could u please tell me if so, where i went wrong. If i have a bad editing history, either i wouldn't have been accorded the reviewing rights or could be revoked on any such incident. Feel free to ask me or if u weren't satisfied of my answers u can ask for third opinion. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 12:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

about paravur

As i have seen your uploads of paravur, it is a beautiful town . It is a must visit for everyone — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaane Khan (talk • contribs) 09:16, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear @Shaane Khan, i don't take credits for that, because those uploads weren't mine. They were uploaded to English Wikipedia by another user and I just moved some them to commons as it is the sole media repository for all other Wikimedia projects. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 13:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Named passenger trains of India

Hi there,

Noticed that you removed the category of named passenger trains of India across several pages. May i pls know why such a move was made??

Superfast1111 (talk) 16:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Dear @Superfast1111, when i accidently slipped into that category. I found that towns(places) and railway stations were into that category, which is really messy and confusing. Also though there is separate sub-category for Garib Rath, Shatabdi, Jan Shatabdi, Rajdhani expresses, etc., they were still present in named passenger trains of India category too, which is quite dubious. Why this duplicity in adding a category? IMO, all Jan Shatabdi trains should be moved into Category:Jan Shatabdi Express trains and the same category may be placed within Category:Named passenger trains of India and like wise for others chain of trains too. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 17:31, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi there, needed your help at the Bhopal Express page. I have uploaded this image through commons https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ABhopal_Express.jpg. But when i attempted to post in on the article, the image that showed up was some thing else. Could you take a look pls??

Superfast1111 (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

It because of issues in file name. Similar file name as you uploaded in Commons also exists in EN WP too. As a default, articles on english WP takes image from same project and not from commons. BTW, i have the listed the image at WP for deletion, as it is of poor quality and not encyclopedic. Decision will be taken on that after 7 days. So you need wait for a week to include your image. Keep the page in your watchlist. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 15:39, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hey Man, i am concerned about your edits on Chhattisgarh Sampark Kranti Superfast Express. Various aspects in the up & down direction are different hence must be mentioned separately. .i.e. 10 stops in one direction & 11 in the other, The distance covered is also different, time taken differs by 40 mins. All this info cannot be averaged out. Hence pls consider your edit there.

Superfast1111 (talk) 13:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Check this website, it is quite reliable to add about details of stoppings or you can consider IRCTC. IMO, i always refrain from adding indiarailinfo.com, makemytrip.com, cleartrip.com or similar travel websites when most reliable sources from Indian Railways and newspapers are available. With indiarailinfo.com as only exception i consider it for mapping purpose only. Its my humble suggestion to follow the same, so that we can bring out good and standard indian railway articles in future. Rest please stick to the instructions for concerned parameters set at {{Infobox rail service}}. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 14:38, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Do you agree with the edits of Dicklyon on Chennai Central Mysore Shatabdi Express & Latur Express ??

Superfast1111 (talk) 16:23, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Absolutely, i agree with the edits of @Dicklyon. It is the responsibility of the editor to double check before creating an article, else we have to simply agree with a merge or a redirect from an experienced editor as per existing guidelines. There's no rush to create an article, instead an existing article can be improved which is not in a good shape. Hence i would suggest you to double check before creating an article, if you are unable to do so, you may ask any experienced editor for guidance. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 18:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Could you pop over to the Lucknow Rajdhani Express page. Could use your help with the time table & Fare table a couple of guys seem to want to add to it & by the way thanks for the Bhopal Express image. It has been restored to normal now.

Superfast1111 (talk) 18:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

I'd keep a tab on that page. BTW, about half of the image on Bhopal Express you suggested, has railway parcels and i assume that Shaane Khan has cropped/cleaned the image suitably at commons. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 19:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pizza (2014 film) first look poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pizza (2014 film) first look poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, @Stefan2, thanks for the timely notification. Media2win, had uploaded a new file separately instead of using "Upload new version of the file" option in the original file page. Since his file was w/out proper license, i removed it from the article citing same reason and replacing the updated version of the old file. Please kindly look through. If any issues ping me. Thank you. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ)^(Support) 00:23, 12 June 2014 (UTC)