User talk:BadMombo1660

Welcome!

Hi BadMombo1660! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Classicwiki (talk) If you reply to me here, please ping me. 06:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, BadMombo1660, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —usernamekiran (talk) 23:26, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Spiritwood Incident

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Spiritwood Incident, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:19, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gun details

I'm not sure that some of the details that have been added are all that important. ♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:45, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why not?

Ballistics/forensics/autopsy details are a big part of things, I think it is disappointing how such details are usually not reported on by journalists.

If a mass shooting article on wikipedia simpily says "[insert number] people were killed" in the "shooting" section of the article, and no further details are given, I find that to be a huge disappointment. (2021 San Jose and Indianapolis shooting articles are very dull because no details are given.)

A ballistic report is how investigators learn about the order of events. BadMombo1660 (talk) 12:46, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]