User talk:BGManofID

License tagging for Image:WWI alt.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:WWI alt.PNG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Your Census map was wrong

Hispanic is not a racial category since 2000. The 1990-2000 census considered Hispanic to be a race with the subcategories white Hispanic and non-white Hispanic. Currently, for the 2000-2010 Census "Hispanic or Latino" and "not Hispanic or Latino" are labeled as "ethnicities" which are counted separate from race. In the 2000 Census, they were asked on a different quetion from race. Also, your map did not recognize the "American Indian and Alaskan Native" race which the 2000 US Census defines to include the indigenous peoples of North, South and Central America.--^DarkTea 18:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. However, for most purposes, people tend not to make the distinction between white Hispanics and non-white Hispanics -- and in fact, most Hispanics are mestizos, and I have often wondered why the Census does not add a Mestizo racial category -- so "Hispanic" is seen as a "race". Also, perhaps I was a little confusing about what I meant on the map. There are no solidly American Indian countries in existence whose inhabitants are automatically considered "American Indian". So, a person writing "Guatemalan", for example, won't automatically be considered "American Indian", even though somebody writing in "Haitian" will be considered "Black" and a "Russian" will be considered "White". Hence the addendum I added about ethnic groups within nations, such as Maya and Quechua. But a "Guatemalan" will automatically be considered "Hispanic". -- BGMan 20:00, 20 December 2006 (CST)

Cuba

Hello BG. Please leave 'Fidel Castro' in the infobox until his resignation takes effect (February 24, 2008). Until then, he's still President of Cuba. GoodDay (talk) 17:29, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi. You're currently engaged in inserting unsourced information and claiming that it's "obvious" that it's correct. You might be new and not informed about the policies, so I'm taking this opportunity to inform you. Wikipedia is not about truth, it's about verifiability. A statement may be completely correct and still unsuitable for Wikipedia if it's not possible to source. Wikipedia is not the place where we publish our own ideas and speculations. Like every other encyclopedia, it's a place where we report on established findings. I would also like to point out that you have repeatedly removed valid tags without sourcing the tagged statements. Take this as a mild warning, such practices constitute vandalism and could lead to a block if you pursue in doing so. Your interest in the Germanic languages is of course warmly welcomed, but please edit in accordance with Wikipedia policies. Cheers JdeJ (talk) 06:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

links in English Language

Hi, the links you re-added to English language fail WP:EL. I've reverted your change again but incorrectly marked the change as vandalism, which was unintentional. Please accept my apologies for this, I appreciate you were not engaged in vandalism. --HighKing (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Republic of Ireland, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article China, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. William Avery (talk) 02:37, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello BGManofID! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Teemu Sippo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:08, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/f/ in Georgian?

Hi. Do you have a source for your addition to the Georgian language page where you said that ფ is pronounced as /f/ when it corresponds to an /f/ sound in loan words from Greek and other languages? It was (and is) my understanding that when foreign words containing /f/ are incorporated into Georgian, the sound is spelled as ფ, and the ფ is pronounced normally (as /pʰ/). For example, პროფესია (profession, occupation) is pronounced /p'rɔpʰɛsia/ (not /p'rɔfɛsia/). As far as I am aware, /f/ is not a separate phoneme in Georgian; rather, it occurs only as an alternative pronunciation of ვ before unvoiced consonants. Admittedly, I only know a very small amount of Georgian, so I am not in a position to put myself forth as any sort of authority on this. Richwales (talk · contribs) 02:31, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My impression is that it's mainly confined to the educated classes, but spreading; the closest correspondence I can find is Finnish. That's why I put it in parentheses (like f in the Phonology section of the Finnish article), since it can't quite be considered native, or at least not yet. BGManofID (talk) 04:23, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Kangaroo, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 20:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Arvanites may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kyrgyz people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tajik and Uzbek. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Putin khuilo!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Slavic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BGManofID. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced statistics

Hello, I'm Cordless Larry. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Demography of the United Kingdom, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, I'm Jolly Janner. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Immigration to Canada, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Please note that the verifiability policy mandates that unsourced material that has been challenged, such as by a "fact" tag, or by its removal, may not be added back without a reliable, published source being cited for the content, using an inline citation. The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article, and the burden is on the person wishing to keep in the disputed material. So if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, following these requirements! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jolly Ω Janner 08:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Friday the 13th, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 00:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BGManofID. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fucking, Austria— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Republican Party (United States), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 05:13, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BGManofID. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"White Russian Americans" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect White Russian Americans and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 27#White Russian Americans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Mhawk10 (talk) 16:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits/original research

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]